Trump

Security measures in US schools – shocking stats

7961F90E-A4B5-41C4-9A74-BE162478283B.png

Let’s get one thing clear. Whether victims of shootings are kindergarten kids, school students, work colleagues or old age pensioners, the sheer act of it points to an increasingly sick element of society. To take innocent lives because of one’s own sense of subjective injustice can’t be justified. That’s hardly an earth shattering revelation. However what is actually going on at schools when it comes to securing students safety? The stats are mind boggling.

A 2017 study by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) reported the following,

In the 2013–14 school year, 93 percent of public schools reported that they controlled access to school buildings by locking or monitoring doors during school hours. Other safety and security measures reported by public schools included the use of security cameras to monitor the school (75 percent), a requirement that faculty and staff wear badges or picture IDs (68 percent), and the enforcement of a strict dress code (58 percent). In addition, 24 percent of public schools reported the use of random dog sniffs to check for drugs, 20 percent required that students wear uniforms, 9 percent required students to wear badges or picture IDs, and 4 percent used random metal detector checks.

Breaking down some of the categories in the chart 5.5% of primary schools use sniffer dogs to check for drugs!! Over half of high schools have random drug searches. 9% of high schools have metal detectors. How did it get to this? Is taking such preventive action having an impact?

In 1994, the federal government began requiring schools to introduce safety programs in an attempt to crack down on violence on school grounds. Many schools introduced metal detectors to check for guns, knives and other weapons. The year after the measures were introduced, violent deaths on high school campuses across the United States halved.

Then in 1999, the Columbine High School shooting reset the bar on violence inside the schoolyard. Armed with shot guns, machine guns, pistols and pipe bombs two students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, murdered 12 students and one teacher before committing suicide. Listening to interviews of those who survived, the answer was the same – the two were regarded as outcasts. It was later shown that they were on anti-depressant medication and had committed multiple felonies. An excellent documentary done by Zero Hour chronologically runs through their mindset

In May 2002, the Secret Service published a report that examined 37 U.S. school shootings showing strikingly similar signals. The findings were:

1) Incidents of targeted violence at school were rarely sudden, impulsive acts. Prior to most incidents, other people knew about the attacker’s idea and/or plan to attack.

2) Most attackers did not threaten their targets directly prior to advancing the attack.
There is no accurate or useful profile of students who engaged in targeted school violence.

3) Most attackers engaged in some behavior prior to the incident that caused others concern or indicated a need for help.

4) Most attackers had difficulty coping with significant losses or personal failures. Many had considered or attempted suicide.

5) Many attackers felt bullied, persecuted, or injured by others prior to the attack.

6) Most attackers had access to and had used weapons prior to the attack.

7) In many cases, other students were involved in some capacity.

8) Despite prompt law enforcement responses, most shooting incidents were stopped by means other than law enforcement intervention.

Trump’s suggestion of arming teachers seems ludicrous to outsiders. To have holstered teachers (boils down to a question of how many would want to ‘carry’ in the classroom) or armed sentries in front of schools hardly sends the right messages about teaching respect. Then again with the ever growing surge of kids growing up in single parent households (currently 40% of white households and 70% of black households) in the US the psychological studies point to an increase in dysfunctionality in kids because of a lack a stable guardian to keep them on the rails.

Banning guns or enforcing gun free zones won’t prevent future massacres. Will America need 100% of schools to have airport style security with pat downs, ion scanners and prison style walls to prevent would be perpetrators breaking in? Maybe they will if families keep breaking down and disgruntled delinquent teenagers feel they need to vent.

Yet come between some Americans and the 2nd Amendment and all manner of excuses to justify ownership surfaces. As an Australian, my country is often highlighted as a success story of mandatory gun confiscation after the Port Arthur massacre in 1996.

Yes Australia hasn’t seen a massacre since yet there was never a big problem in the first place. 661,000 firearms were removed from circulation. Or 1 gun for every 33 people. In the US it is c.1 gun for every person in circulation. Even if a third of households have them we are looking at 1 gun per 3 people in the US.

The Aussie government offered $500/gun average. If Trump ran the same programme (albeit 21 years later) and taking into account inflation then conservatively at $1,000 a gun he would be looking at a cost of $320bn. To put that in perspective the annual US military budget is around $680bn. So a combined spend of $1 trillion.

Yet as tragic as the Florida shooting is, mainstream and social media has turned this into a cesspit of vile abuse and misinformation.

Whether it be the conspiracy theories of high school student David Hogg being a CNN planted child actor, Trump’s hand written  notes or kids threatening to march on Washington the whole tragedy is turning into a debacle. While we should be mourning the deaths of 17 innocent students at the hands of a lunatic, the media seems more focused on Trump bashing and posting memes of Republicans in the pockets of the NRA.

If guns in schools have been an issue since the 1990s, we have had ample numbers of administrations who could have acted but didn’t. If the 14 gun massacres that occurred under the Obama Administration when the Democrats had control of the House and Senate  resulted in no action being taken why the song and dance by Democrats today? Sounds like political point scoring at its worst.

This isn’t or at least shouldn’t be a partisan issue. This is an issue of a breakdown in social values. By allowing single parent households to simply and easily marry the state through generous subsidies, parental responsibility is being thrown out the window. To be fair automatic weapons are hardly a requirement for a civilian population but let’s deal with the real issues behind why so many students are being massacred rather than just the method of how they commit the atrocities.

Banning guns seems so simple to cure the problem but as the stats above make clear, the solution is far more complex than armed teachers, rent-a-cops at school gates and metal detectors. Parents need to start taking far more responsibility and the media needs to start focusing on keeping it real.

It is disturbing to turn a tragedy into yet another excuse to crank up Trump Derangement Syndrome. He may have handled the messaging poorly (as he does with most issues) but let’s look at the history. Almost 20 years have gone by since Columbine High and despite countless repeat events, where has the same level of outrage been? Exactly. Nowhere. Tragedies should never be used for political gain. Where is the dignity for the dead? Perhaps we can just boil the whole behaviour surrounding the awful event as merely “moving with the times”. It is the term we seem to hear for every other excuse to shut down sensible debate.

Ultimately it is for Americans to decide to vote for parties that will change laws for the greater good. The rest of the world can shake their head and waggle the finger at America’s gun laws but perhaps they should focus on how good they’ve got it at home by comparison.

Apparently this is newsworthy

F968EC37-2569-4F38-98DC-26CDC3D5C409.jpeg

Apparently the mainstream media think this is newsworthy. A 70yo man who happens to be president has bald patches. Who knew? Guess that means that one should take their other media commentary about affairs of the nation – foreign and domestic – far more seriously with Pulitzer Prize winning journalism like this. One would be forgiven for thinking America had never had a balding POTUS – Gerald Ford, LBJ, Richard Nixon to name three. Yawn. How insensitive and offensive such an article is to the hirsute!

Approval ratings of world leaders

8A045556-211E-4DE9-B940-A27ED3474BA5.jpeg

Macron, France, Nov., 2017: 46%
Merkel, Germany, Dec, 2017: 38%
Trudeau, Canada, Jan., 2018: 37%
Turnbull, Australia Feb 2018: 37%
May, UK, Jan., 2018: 29%
Pena Nieto, Mexico, Nov., 2017: 26%
Trump, USA, Feb., 2018: 49% (Rasmussen)

Looks like the mainstream media should be serving up the beatings for unpopularity to other world leaders.

Hillary only proves how unfit she was for President

2A0A9E17-4A73-47CD-AA3F-DC38B63AC137.jpeg

Clinton’s appearance at the Grammy’s reading ‘Fire & Fury’ only shows she has learnt absolutely nothing. Out of touch liberal hanging with her millionaire mates. No humility and yet again shows how she can’t let go the fact that her coronation fell through. Her appearance would be funny only if it wasn’t so cringingly true. At least she can count on the champagne socialists at the Grammy’s buying a copy of her book so they can read about how one can absolve oneself from all responsibility.  Even better it’s discounted.

Usually a mutually exclusive headline in WaPo

4FDAE793-833B-49FB-A5AF-A534F98129FA.jpeg

Surprising to see such an opinion piece in WaPo. Usually mutually exclusive subject matter with such a title. Admittedly the author said she had incredibly low expectations.

Girther movement outweighs 38bn Apples adding to his bottom line

F2A19F0E-61C9-4550-9591-BF649ECBD24F.jpeg

Oh how the liberal feeds have lit up about Trump’s health diagnosis. The girther movement. No noise about Apple’s 22,000 new jobs plan and repatriation of $38 billion of oveseas cash to hand to the US Treasury. Virtue signaling works both ways. Just like the tax cuts had corporations promoting that they were rolling out their $1,000 bonuses for 200,000 staff etc one after another expect a conga line of tax dollars rolling into the coffers.

That’s right, US corporates will be eager to show their good citizenship status to get great publicity for doing so. Don’t wanna miss that train. Not even billions of advertising dollars would get the same reach. None of it would have happened without tax incentives to do it. What shareholder wants his/her company fritting away tax dollars to the tax man if it can be avoided? Yet the liberal media will whine about Trump pandering to evil corporates. Well evil corporates have even more sinister tax accountants who find “legal” loopholes. This time paying tax has strangely positive outcomes. Obama could have done it but he was too busy doubling debt and the numbers on food stamps!

Apple will certainly not be the last company to do it. Still better to focus on a septuagenerian’s waistline than the country’s bottom line. In typical liberal logic fashion they should be encouraging his poor dietary habits to hopefully force a medical issue  which sees him out of office earlier. Roll on the 8 year term…

NB Estimates Show 70% of Americans have less than $1,000 in savings. A $1,000 bonus is not trivial in the slightest. For so many Americans that have been destitute since Lehman Brothers folded, don’t underestimate the power of improved economic fortunes to push partisan politics to the back of the bus. Why would people seek risking their wallets thinning just so they can feel morally good about themselves on Facebook?

4 charts Dems should pay attention to before censuring Trump’s State of the Union address

BE3EF059-50B3-491E-9E86-A62DD361D306.jpeg

While these four Democratic reps plan to skip the SOTU address one can pretty much take it to the bank that they’ll be the first to hurl abuse at the contents of it. As Robert Gottliebsen wrote today,

No American President in recent US history has so dramatically improved the American economy boosting pay rates, job numbers, retail sales, business investment, profits and, of course, the share market. It’s an astounding transformation that will create a tidal wave of repercussions around the world…Conversely no President in recent US history has been more politically incorrect and insensitive in his use of language. And in most media outlets this aspect of his administration completely overshadows the economic achievements.

They might also note that black, Hispanic and Asian unemployment rates have never been this low in history. It is the Whites who should be up in arms at this supposed racist president who is making them live in a relative unemployment ‘sh*thole’.

US White Unemployment Rate

9A00A989-4C24-49C8-88B1-849E965CE50D

US Asian Unemployment Rate

E3916C9F-5531-4E47-BD95-8421572C920F

US Black/African-American Unemployment rate

635B6238-7306-4C67-9C0F-E75EA62B1A5E

US Hispanic/Latino Unemployment Rate

065952D1-40E9-4672-B8AB-73B4D342AB46

34B90701-7CBB-4776-9068-1E5AE9742DCB.jpeg