#robertreich

Staring at the dictator – redux

507657ED-F3DB-4239-8029-7931BB973B12.jpeg

In Feb 2017, CM wrote a piece titled ‘Staring at the Dictator’ which highlighted that winning hearts and minds comes from sensible and reasonable dialogue. Not from widespread activism where the sole purpose is to shut down debate. Hasn’t the left learnt that physically and verbally bullying people senseless and mocking them for their supposed ignorance doesn’t work? Yet they still keep screaming the same hypo-ventilated bile, as Robert Reich has below. Nothing would make CM happier if democracy does its job in any country. If we believe he speaks for the majority, he has absolutely nothing to fear. No need for protests of any kind. Yet he shouldn’t blame the constituents for overthrowing bad governments who believe in divine incumbency. Blame bad policy.

If Democrats hadn’t treated the last election as a coronation then perhaps Hillary Clinton may have got her wish. Things had obviously become so bad at the grass roots level that the establishment was rejected. Even after all of the p*ssy grabbing allegations had been brought to light, Trump still won. His vulgarity was on the ballot. His “no one respects women more than I do” lie after this revelation in the 2nd debate was broadcast to 100s of millions. It was also on the ticket. Despite his supposed racist demagoguery, he got a higher proportion of black and Hispanic voters than either McCain or Romney. Don’t hate the player, hate the game. These are facts, as much as we may not like what they portend.

The #whitelash arguments don’t rub either because the same people voted a black man in twice. Clinton didn’t lose because she was a woman. She lost in part because she ran on the basis she was a woman. Surveys may show that Republican voters don’t want a female president however should Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley run in 2024 she would win their support on the basis of her strength, not her gender or her Native American/Sikh heritage. Ability should be all that matters. Clinton’s constant griping 18 months after her loss shows just how poor a president she would have made. It is so bad even Rasmussen reports that a majority of Democrats don’t think she would have been any better than Trump. Take that!

If Trump loses legitimately (assuming he runs) in 2020 then so be it. In the last 1.5 years in office, American citizens have had plenty of time to weigh him in their own minds, regardless of the media’s relentless onslaught of over-the-top sensationalist click-baiting. If citizens feel he has delivered in areas that affected them on a personal level, they’re probably on balance willing to vote for the same again unless the alternative offers something better. At the same time they have had plenty of time to weigh the Democrats. They’ve seen first hand the bitterness at the State of the Union plastered on the faces of Pelosi et al. They’ve heard Maxine Waters call to her supporters to gang up on the staff in the current administration. They’ve seen countless Hollywood celebrities chant vile hate from celebrating the decapitation of the President, calling Ivanka a “feckless c*nt” to hoping 12yo Barron is ripped from Melania’s arms and caged with pedophiles. Democrat supporters have gone so far as to shoot GOP politicians. CM is quite sure that however horrid the President may be, these are hardly the types of antics that will sway opinion of the swing voters to join the self-appointed ‘righteous’ like Reich. And no, not all Democrats think like this much like many Republicans don’t endorse stupidity from their own. It lets down both sides.

Republicans or swing voters do not respond well to being called intolerant, cruel, racist, misogynist, xenophobic or climate sceptics without fact or basis. Since when does one consciously vote for others over their own needs? It isn’t selfish. If one is buried under onerous tax legislation, red tape or financial destitution do they vote to put the interests of others above their own? No. As a long term Liberal Party (aka conservatives) voter in Australia, the current party has ‘left’ me. I didn’t leave them. They did not win my vote last election. It must be earned. They don’t represent my values. It didn’t take tribal beltings to force me to a conclusion. Nor negative media to discover it. Yet somehow the activists believe that constant bleating will cause me to change my mind.

What would be nice is to see properly supported factual (not subjective rhetorical) evidence that 63mn Trump supporters are as one when it comes to all the claims they make. I would love to see the arguments in all their gore should they exist. Not a one off event. Happy to see where my own arguments hold deep flaws.  Many Trump voters detest him on a moralistic level yet are happy to champion his achievements if they feel they get a direct benefit from them. So often claims are made to undermine his followers. Every time (and often) these assertions prove to be baseless, the journey to sway the other side to see reason gets thwarted even further. Time magazine issuing a confession over the photo-shopped cover of last week ended up at the bottom of a long article. It just shows just how unapologetic they are. Kathy Griffin was sorry until she wasn’t again. Talk about self serving.

To the comments made by Robert Reich today:

“My friends, this is a dark hour. Intolerance, cruelty, racism, misogyny, xenophobia, and environmental destruction have been let loose across the land.

Trump controls the Republican Party, the Republican Party controls the House and Senate, and the Senate and Trump will soon control the Supreme Court.

Republicans also control both chambers in 32 states (33 if you count Nebraska) and 33 governorships. And in many of these states they are entrenching their power by gerrymandering and arranging to suppress votes.

Yet only 27 percent of Americans are Republican, and the vast majority of Americans disapprove of Trump. The GOP itself is now little more than Trump, Fox News, a handful of billionaire funders, and evangelicals who oppose a woman’s right to choose, gay marriage, and the Constitution’s separation of church and state.

So what are we – the majority — to do?

First and most importantly, do not give up. That’s what they want us to do. Then they’d have no opposition at all.

Second, in the short term, if you are represented by a Republican senator, do whatever you can to get him or her to reject Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, or, at the least, postpone consideration until after the midterm elections. Urge others to join with you. 202-224-3121

Third, make a ruckus. Demonstrate. Engage in non-violent civil disobedience. Fight lies with truth. Join the resistance. Participate in http://www.indivisible.org and https://swingleft.org.

Fourth, vote this November 6 for people who will stand up to all this outrage. Mobilize and organize others to do so. Contact friends and relations in “red” states, and urge them to do the same.

Fifth, help lay the groundwork for the 2020 presidential election, so that even if Trump survives Mueller and impeachment he will not be reelected.

Finally, know that this fight will be long and hard. It will require our patience, our courage, and our resolve. The stakes could not be higher.”

Perhaps what Reich fails to get is that he is almost backhanding his own supporters in his rant. It is more than likely that a majority of Republican (and no doubt many centrist Democrat) voters want the liberal left to give up because it has become nothing but white noise. The more they protest the more tuned out they become. Control of the Supreme Court? I encourage you to read the cake shop transcript where Associate Justice Sotomayor shows without a doubt she is a political activist, not a judge. It is embarrassingly obvious. The Supreme Court is only supposed to apply impartiality around current laws (or those at the time of the legal action), not make a song and dance about wish lists and try to piece a verdict around how nice it would be if things were different. She was trying to argue 2018 laws around a 2012 issue. One doesn’t have to be a lawyer to work that one out.

To the assertion that a handful of billionaire funders lean the GOPs way, he should reflect that most of the billionaires in America reside in blue states. In today’s world, the big corporations win more by backing Democrats because more onerous regulation benefits their ability to squeeze out the smaller competition thanks to red tape. Laissez faire? You’ve got to be kidding.

Perhaps in closing, the most compelling argument Reich makes is the one which stands out above all others – “we, the majority.” If he wants to stop Trump, he just needs the majority to vote on the shared basis of his beliefs – case closed. No need for protests. After all he says that Trump’s base is so small. If almost 3 years of negative spin on the sitting POTUS has failed to convince the majority, nothing will. Screaming in public may seem therapeutic to the masses but should the GOP win the mid-terms then Reich will prove just as out of touch as he was prior to the election.

Silence is golden. Let democracy take its course. Let us see whether the Russians consolidate their pick in the mid-terms…Putin has even more reason to ensure America sees more “red.”

Flake News

IMG_0312.PNG

Fake news, very fake news or in many cases it is just flake news. Flake news? The lack of context and perspective and trying to draw parallels with irrelevance. Take this piece from Robert Reich taking a trademark swipe at Trump rationalizing it with a very poor understanding of the industry he seeks to convince his audience he is an expert in:

“I just watched Trump give a speech at South Carolina’s Boeing facility where the new 787 “Dreamliner” is being unveiled. Trump said it was “built right here” in South Carolina, and that “our goal as a nation must be to rely less on imports and more on products made here in the U.S.A.” He also called for “a very substantial penalty to be paid when they fire their people and move to another country, make the product, and think that they are going to sell it back.” And said he’ll lower taxes and get rid of regulations that send our jobs to those other countries. “We want products made by our workers in our factories stamped by those four magnificent words, ‘Made in the U.S.A.'”

All fantasy. In fact, almost a third of Boeing’s Dreamliner comes from abroad — from countries with high taxes and high regulations, good wages, strong unions, excellent schools including technical education, and universally-available health care.

1.The Italian firm Alenia Aeronautica makes the center fuselage.

2. French firm Messier-Dowty makes the aircraft’s landing-gear system.

3. German firm Diehl Luftfahrt Elektronik supplies the main cabin lighting.

4. Swedish firm Saab Aerostructures manufactures the access doors.

5. Japanese company Jamco makes parts for the lavatories, flight deck interiors and galleys.

6. French firm Thales makes its electrical power conversion system.

7. Thales selected GS Yuasa, a Japanese firm, in 2005 to supply it with the system’s lithium-ion batteries.

Oh, and the first delivery of the Dreamliner is scheduled to take place next year – to Singapore Airlines. Currently there are 149 orders for it from worldwide customers including British Airways and Air France.

In other words, contrary to Trump, the Boeing Dreamliner is made all over the world and will be sold all over the world.

His “America First” economics is total demagoguery. We get a first-class workforce by investing in their education, training, infrastructure, and healthcare — not xenophobic grandstanding.

What do you think?

Well Mr Reich. Here is what I think.

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner has been one of the biggest program failures in the company’s history. While a technical marvel it was three years late, largely exposed by Boeing’s disintermediated supply chain, a break with decades of practice.

Aircraft production is a precise business. It requires that all parts arrive on time and to achieve that all suppliers must be on board. The 3-month delay of a $1 plastic fastener can mean a plane can’t be fully completed let alone delivered. So multi million dollar wing set production gets impacted. So do landing gears, engines and stabilizers. Everything is affected. Boeing’s delays sent many suppliers into financial distress. In some cases it was so bad Boeing had to step in to buy out suppliers (e.g. Spirit) to prevent further delays and cost overruns.

The second big flaw in Mr Reich’s article is that Boeing is a multi-nation aircraft for a reason. It is what is known as risk and revenue sharing partnerships (RRSPs). Companies bid to be on the project and pay a part share in it. It is an investment. They are shareholders to all intents and purposes. Companies like Mitsubishi Heavy and Kawasaki Heavy bought a stake in the project. Boeing was the project manager and designer. In short international companies bought themselves a ticket to be on the 787 with the hope if it was a success they’d be higher up the technology curve when 777 or 737-Max went to similar production materials and processes.

Boeing enthusiastically embraced this outsourcing, both locally and internationally, as a way of lowering costs and accelerating development. The approach was intended to cut the 787’s development time by 30% and with it, development cost from $10 to $6 billion. Estimates show that cost ended up being $20bn and 3 years late and is expected to break even in its 10th year. It is far from the success it was meant to be.

Another thing with aircraft suppliers is their scarcity. Aircraft manufacture comes at huge fixed costs and low lot volume. Around 120 Dreamliners are made a year and the reason the supply chain is like it is makes perfect sense. Suppliers need guarantees to ensure production levels meet their financial objectives. Parts certification is a tricky business.

Boeing needs to be sure suppliers meet certification requirements. If people think pharmaceutical companies going through the FDA process to sell a new drug is a nightmare, they should try to get a new aircraft past FAA regulations. While a drug might have minor side effects like drowsiness, a plane has to fly safely every time in almost any condition. Therefore the quality, durability and safety aspects for a plane that flies for up to 40 years is second to none. There are no short cuts.

The Boeing 787 was also made with all new production processes and materials not used before on this scale. The wings were carbon fibre composite. Mitsubishi Heavy not only agreed to be a RRSP but was willing to invest to meet Boeing’s production goals. Toray, the maker of the composite material was seen as the most reliable and stable supplier. These were cold hard facts and when building a new aircraft, airline customers want to minimize risk. Boeing needs to guarantee risk minimization and made rational decisions based on that. Had those suppliers been all in the USA you can be assured US suppliers would have been picked. Sadly many have lost competitiveness. An unknown fact is that Lockheed Martin called in Toyota to help it finesse its production processes for its disastrous F-35 programme.

So while Reich points to the ‘social’ qualities (education, healthcare, strong unions and good wages) of what goes to make an airliner they are generalizations to say the least. Japanese unions are far from strong and definitely not militant. Mitsubishi Heavy wing workers would be paid the same as their elevator assembly brothers across the hall. They wouldn’t necessarily be on high wages. I would imagine that many of Boeing’s designers have Ivy League or similar pedigrees. Assemblers would also possess serious qualifications.

In any event the point Trump was making was the same jawboning at election time. Make America First and keep jobs at home. Ideally he would be saying to Boeing that following Airbus’ example of assembling a portion of A320s in China is not his wish. In fact Boeing now has a joint venture with a Chinese entity that installs interiors and paint exteriors on 737 airliners. Is he a criminal for requesting companies stay at home?

Yes Mr Reich, President Trump is not perfect but he is doing his level best to turn around the fortunes of a country sold out by the establishment over many decades. Indeed if he cuts corporate taxes and incentivizes companies to stay at home because of a rational reason to do so that will be key. Instead of sticking it to him Mr Reich, try look beyond your prejudice to see why 64mn Americans put him in charge of their future. He may well fail but voters took that risk when they put him in office. They care not for the petty issues you raise in your articles.

This article seeks to take pot shots without assessing the full facts of an industry. What you wrote wasn’t fake news but flake news.