#justintrudeau

Now Clinton lost the 2016 election because sexual harassers like Matt Lauer were the problem

BFD89AE0-BEFF-4967-A9DC-404A6BF6974B.jpeg

Just when the lame excuses couldn’t get any worse, the NY Times’ Jill Filipovic, in ‘The Men who cost Clinton the Election’ thinks that Clinton lost because of the male journalists (recently fired for claims of sexual harassment) were too tough on her and too easy on Trump. We are 12 months on from the election and despite the 10,000 excuses we’ve heard as to why she lost, this one is truly grasping at straws.

Filipovic wrote,

Many of the male journalists who stand accused of sexual harassment were on the forefront of covering the presidential race between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Matt Lauer interviewed Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump in an official “commander-in-chief forum” for NBC. He notoriously peppered and interrupted Mrs. Clinton with cold, aggressive, condescending questions hyper-focused on her emails, only to pitch softballs at Mr. Trump and treat him with gentle collegiality…Mr. Charlie Rose, after the election, took a tone similar to Mr. Lauer’s with Mrs. Clinton — talking down to her, interrupting her, portraying her as untrustworthy. Mr. Halperin was a harsh critic of Mrs. Clinton, painting her as ruthless and corrupt, while going surprisingly easy on Mr. Trump.”

So Matt Lauer went for the jugular? Isn’t that the point of these debates or commander-in-chief forums – to make the politician squeam under pressure? So her deleting and bleaching 30,000 emails was not a relevant topic?

Mr Halperin painted her as a ruthless and corrupt candidate, when her foundation was exposed for pay to play, the hiring of Debbie Wassermann-Schulz as her campaign director after she brazenly knifed Bernie Sanders during the DNC run-off or receiving the debate questions in advance from Donna Brazile?

Indeed, it is hard to see how Charlie Rose had an impact on the 2016 election when he was tough on her post the event.

Still one can’t escape the fact that for however horrible Trump might have been as a inarticulate, vulgar and bullying GOP candidate, all the more reason she should have smashed it. Had she not taken the election as a coronation, actually visited the areas most in hardship instead of sticking to the $1,000 plate dinner fund raisers in the hubs of NY, LA and San Francisco maybe she would have learnt that it wasn’t a formality. Instead she stuck to identity politics and in the end lost to a candidate who openly stared down the barrel of a camera lens to tens of millions after the ‘grab the p*ssy’ episode and said “no one respects women more than I do” in debate two. Even women saw this and still voted for him.

What Filipovic fails to realize is that gender is an irrelevant benchmark for politics. All that matters is ability in the eyes of the electorate. For Michelle Obama to shame women who voted for Trump is part of the problem. Whether ability is delivered is another question but for millions of struggling Americans not living the dream they took a risk to vote for someone that wasn’t intertwined in the political machine that had failed to get them out of financial squalor. They may not have money but a vote is a great equalizer. Sure, Trump’s complete lack of political experience is telling with the constant cabinet reshuffles and both parties trying to distance themselves from his firebrand style of politics.

So indeed had Lauer been exposed as a sexual harasser before the event then would the outcome of Clinton’s 2016 campaign really have changed? Unlikely as Hillary Clinton was carrying so much baggage that even blind Freddie could have seen through the fact that for as horrible Trump was, she was even worse on so many levels.

Indeed if Filipovic wants to indirectly promote the idea that it was time for a ‘woman’ president, at least give we mere males (and females) some faith that you have a deeper bench than Hillary Clinton. Does a cake store put anything less than its best and delicious looking product in the shop windows on the grand opening day? No. As much as you may wish to point the fingers at a misogynist, sexist bro culture as the blame for her loss, make no mistake that most men (and women) will happily endorse competence over gender because it is in their rational best interests for the long term to do so. So instead of blaming men, perhaps look inside at what women exist in US politics (or any country for that matter) that can carry the torch of freedom on merits alone.

On a final point, while the feminists are at it, where was the outrage at the gushing over the hunky Canadian PM Justin Trudeau when he won his election? How many tweets and messages of teenage crush were seen which focused on his physical characteristics rather than his political acumen (which sadly are missing since being in office). It is a great pity that the Conservative Party in Canada didn’t elect Rona Ambrose over Andrew Scheer as leader. Go on YouTube and watch her decimate Justin Trudeau in every debate. If I was Canadian I would have voted for her given she had raw ability, intelligence and unwavering strength. She just happens to be a woman too.

Rehabilitation lessons in common sense a must

One has to wonder what rehabilitation services for returning ISIS fighters to Canada would look like? Opposition Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer asked that question of PM Trudeau on what his plan would look like to try to rehabilitate people who went to fight for a group that threw homosexuals off buildings for just being gay, burnt allied fighters alive, sold women and children into slavery and raped countless women among many other crimes committed. Trudeau read from a sheet of paper. On what planet does one have to live on to think that a group that fought against Canadian troops and its allies can seriously reintegrate into Canadian society and honestly reform to the values of Canadians?

Put aside arguments about these individuals being freedoms fighters. These people, some who may have individually committed the crimes aforementioned will come back free to live among Canadians. Does the government honestly think that these people can be, much less want to be “rehabilitated” to understand the wonders of democracy and progressivism? To fight for ISIS and the principles of that archaic ideology are probably as far removed from the liberal ideals that Trudeau espouses. What can be absolutely certain – this will be an absolute waste of taxpayer funds to try to convert those that thought the doctrines of ISIS were something to aspire to. Then again with M-103, every day Canadians are gagged from criticizing these same fighters.

When you boil it all down to gravy, it seems that government needs rehabilitation lessons in common sense.

Rona Ambrose to quit Canadian politics

IMG_0098.JPG

In what I can only say is a shame, Interim-leader of the Opposition Rona Ambrose has called it quits on politics after 13 years taking up a job at a Washington think-tank, the Wilson Center. I honestly thought she had a shot at taking the Prime Ministership at the next election given she made mince meat of PM Justin Trudeau every single time she spoke in question time. Her eloquence, ability to attack and make sound arguments had Trudeau on the ropes taking massive body blows. Perhaps he will breathe a sigh of relief now that she has gone.

She will lead the institute’s “efforts to convene U.S. and Canadian officials to explore the benefits of an integrated and competitive North American economy that is focused on job creation and prosperity,”

Canada’s new permanent opposition leader from a list of many candidates will be announced on May 27.  Sounds to me like her own party wasn’t going to give her the full time position which looked thoroughly deserved.

Trudeau lives to fight another day.

Trudeau is literally a paper tiger

IMG_0593.PNG

I honestly can’t see how Trudeau can win the next election. Acting Opposition leader Rona Ambrose took great pleasure into cutting the PM down to size after he had his department make $1,900 worth life size cut outs of him to be placed in the Canadian Embassy in Washington and ten consulates in the United States. His answer was that he spends too much time in the House of Commons. Such is his vanity, even the Speaker of the House had a good chuckle. The Global Affairs department told civil servants to stop ordering them. Ontario MP John Brassard said,  “A life-size, two-dimensional cut-out is probably a perfect metaphor for everything that Justin Trudeau represents… You’ve got the shallow facade, and yet there’s very little in the way of depth or substance there.” 

Look up Rona Ambrose vs Justin Trudeau in question time and watch the bloodbath. She makes mincemeat out of the Canadian PM every time and exposes that behind the looks there is little substance and his poll numbers are reflecting that.

Ambrose wipes the floor with Trudeau again

IMG_9645

After watching numerous sessions of Canadian Parliament one wonders how PM Justin Trudeau stands a chance of winning again in 2020. His opposition, in the form of Rona Ambrose, eats him alive every time causing the Prime Minister to respond by avoiding simple YES or NO answers with empty rhetoric, identity politics and countless ‘umm’s’ and ‘ahhs’. Take Ambrose’s latest attempt to get the Liberals to commit to endorse training for the judiciary to better handle cases involving rape and sexual assault. True to form the PM dodges the question asked and talks of waiting for advice from his quangos and boasting about more women judges since he took office in an attempt to assume female judges would understand rape better than male judges. What an insult!

To assume a female judge will give female victims of sexual violence a better hearing is plain stupid. The judiciary is supposed to have judges who are above gender, race or religion. That’s why we have laws in the first place. To assert that female judges would put personal gender prejudices above their sworn duty is preposterous. The same is true for male judges. Or LGBTI judges or any judge.  Once again identity politics is at the forefront and Trudeau shows himself to be more feminist than the feminists themselves.

YouTube is littered with Ambrose vs Trudeau and the nervousness in his voice each time shows how uncomfortable he is. The only one not seeing it is himself. Canadians may have been sick of Stephen Harper but take a look for yourself and see who looks more like a leader. A hint – it isn’t the Prime Minister.

Ambrose’s JUST Act proposal can be seen here.