#genderpolitics

Man of Steal tripped up by his own kryptonite

The pin-up boy of politics, Canadian PM Justin Trudeau, has been found guilty by the Conflict of Interest & Ethics Commissioner (COIEC) of being involved with interfering in the SNC-Lavalin corruption scandal. Only 70 days to go before Canadian peoplekind can sack him at the election because he is not looking to resign.

What a shame this darling of the left has fallen foul of breaching the ethics code, not once but twice. One hopes Canadians would have wanted him to prioritize his own ethics before lecturing them on feminism, climate change, cutting $10m cheques to convicted terrorists and not having enough money to support veterans.

The COIEC wrote in his summary,

The first step in my analysis was to determine whether Mr. Trudeau sought to influence the decision of the Attorney General as to whether she should intervene in a criminal prosecution involving SNC-Lavalin following the decision of the Director of Public Prosecutions. The evidence showed there were many ways in which Mr. Trudeau, either directly or through the actions of those under his direction, sought to influence the Attorney General.

Having reviewed several possible means of intervening in the matter, Ms. Wilson-Raybould made it known in September that she would not intervene in the Director of Public Prosecutions’ decision.

Mr. Trudeau met with Ms. Wilson-Raybould on September 17, 2018, at which time she reiterated her decision to not intervene in the Director of Public Prosecutions’ decision to not invite SNC-Lavalin to enter into a remediation agreement. She also expressed to Mr. Trudeau her concern of inappropriate attempts to interfere politically with the Attorney General in a criminal matter. Following this meeting, senior officials under the direction of Mr. Trudeau continued to engage both with SNC-Lavalin’s legal counsel and, separately, with Ms. Wilson-Raybould and her ministerial staff to influence her decision, even after SNC-Lavalin had filed an application for a judicial review of theDirector of Public Prosecutions’ decision. These attempts also included encouraging her to re-examine the possibility of obtaining external advice from “someone like” a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Unbeknownst to the Attorney General at that time, legal opinions from two former Supreme Court justices, retained by SNC-Lavalin, had been reviewed by the Prime Minister’s Office and other ministerial offices. Meanwhile, both SNC-Lavalin and the Prime Minister’s Office had approached the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to participate in the matter. The final attempt to influence Ms. Wilson-Raybould occurred during a conversation with the former Clerk of the Privy Council on December 19, 2018, as an appeal, on behalf of Mr. Trudeau, to impress upon her that a solution was needed to prevent the economic consequences of SNC-Lavalin not entering into negotiations for a remediation agreement.

Simply seeking to influence the decision of another person is insufficient for there to be a contravention of section 9. The second step of the analysis was to determine whether Mr. Trudeau, through his actions and those of his staff, sought to improperly further the interests of SNC-Lavalin.

The evidence showed that SNC-Lavalin had significant financial interests in deferring prosecution. These interests would likely have been furthered had Mr. Trudeau successfully influenced the Attorney General to intervene in the Director of Public Prosecutions’ decision. The actions that sought to further these interests were improper since they were contrary to the Shawcross doctrine and the principles of prosecutorial independence and the rule of law.

For these reasons, I found that Mr. Trudeau used his position of authority over Ms. Wilson-Raybould to seek to influence, both directly and indirectly, her decision on whether she should overrule the Director of Public Prosecutions’ decision not to invite SNC-Lavalin to enter into negotiations towards a remediation agreement.

Therefore, I find that Mr. Trudeau contravened section 9 of the Act.”

Trudeau had a hard task to out do his father for political incompetence. Yet he has exceeded admirably. From wearing Indian garb on a state visit to prosecuting the case on a plastics ban with water box bottle things and waving to empty airfields or speaking at the UNGA to a scattering if disinterested people on their mobile phones.

CM still wishes Rona Ambrose was Leader of the Conservatives but it looks as though Andrew Scheer shouldn’t have too much trouble becoming the next PM.

Extinction Rebellion prepares for the communist catwalk

That’s it folks. Forget fashion. Ditch your Manolo Blahniks. Shred your DVF dresses. Burn your designer Armani jeans in a pyre. Even better write a placard and protest outside Gucci or Louis Vuitton. It’s for the planet you know.

Extinction Rebellion (XR) has said London fashion week is unsustainable. Ladies, prepare to wear drab grey gender neutral pant suits from now on. Men will be allowed to wear a skirt presumably so as to foster transgenderism. This will be year round. We’ll be allowed one set only.

The Guardian journalist, Lucy Siegle, wrote,

“the environmental group Extinction Rebellion has seized the initiative, writing to the British Fashion Council (BFC), conveners of London fashion week, demanding it is scrapped in favour of “a people’s assembly of industry professionals and designers as a platform to declare a climate and ecological emergency”

So let’s get this straight, these XR hippiecrits use the very materials and dyes to make a fashion statement to push their agenda.

Tell you what XR, given that China is the largest producer of textiles, please take your protest to Beijing. While you’re at it you can protest China’s 29.3% (and growing) impact on CO2 emissions. Two for the price of one. President Xi would warmly welcome your presence in one of his jails. Afterall you encourage peaceful arrest although you might want to update your legal assistance page for those who do end up being arrested in Tiananmen Square.

Berkeley to drop gender-specific words from city code

Image result for rigel robinson berkeley

Rigel Robinson, a young councillor in Berkeley, California has said that “words matter“. The city will remove gender-specific language like “manhole” and change it to  “maintenance hole.” In his proposal, the words “policemen” and “policewomen” will also be phased out. “He” and “she” will also get the boot in favour of “they”.

Robinson remarked, “Having a male-centric municipal code is inaccurate and not reflective of our reality…Women and non-binary individuals are just as entitled to accurate representation. Our laws are for everyone, and our municipal code should reflect that.

To think of how many non-binary individuals will be able to overcome these deep traumas and get through the day knowing that the metal covers in the road will be renamed. However, what if a maintenance hole identifies as male? Seems unfair that inanimate objects aren’t respected.

Sadly, the only maintenance required is to fill the vacuous space between Robinson’s ears with things that actually matter to residents, even those liberals in California.

Only the radical left could dream this up

Well, well, well. the Inclusive Communications Task Force at the Colorado State University has introduced an appropriate language guide and it has deemed the words “America” and “Americans” might prove offensive to some and have discouraged their use on campus. The reason?

The Americas encompass a lot more than the United States. There is South America, Central America, Mexico, Canada, and the Caribbean just to name a few of 42 countries in total. That’s why the word “americano” in Spanish can refer to anything on the American continent. Yet, when we talk about “Americans” in the United States, we’re usually just referring to people from the United States. This erases other cultures and depicts the United States as the dominant American country.

Why do these people hate their own country, enough to discourage the use of the word that describes it? Maybe the government should stop funding studies because the source of cash has links to so much oppression. Will the students be able to order a cafe Americano at the local roaster? Will they have to politely decline telling people where they are from?

Some of the other loony words that are deemed offensive include:

Basket case

Eye for an eye

Takes the cake

Crazy / Nuts / Maniac / Lunatic / Insane / Deranged / Psycho / Demented / Depressed / OCD

Freshman

Eenie meenie miney moe

He or She

Ladies or Gentlemen

CM encourages readers to open up the link in the first paragraph to see what they deem as appropriate responses.

CM’s favourite:

Paddy wagon – “Paddy originated in the late 1700s as a shortened form of Patrick and then later a pejorative term for any Irishman. Wagon naturally refers to a vehicle. “Paddy wagon” either stemmed from the large number of Irish police officers or the perception that rowdy, drunken Irishmen constantly ended up in the back of police cars..”

Appropriate word according to CSU is police car.

Perhaps we should celebrate that at the very least formerly oppressed whites are included in CSU’s language guide.

Perhaps there is a real argument for free tertiary education in the US. It’s worth absolutely nothing.

The Ringling Sisters

What a clown show. All four Democrat representatives held a press conference where they made themselves out as helpless, fragile victims. It was all about identity and zero about substance. If they wish to stop division in America they sure have an odd way of showing it.

Isn’t it amazing that in a country supposedly so divided, it still afforded the opportunity for these four minorities to be democratically elected? Surely if it is the racist cesspit they make it out to be there is no chance in hell they’d be where they are today? They’d be stuck under the jackboot of the white supremacists.

Of course anything Trump says is automatically branded racist, bigoted, homophobic, xenophobic or any other form of outrage. Poor old Nancy Pelosi got a taste of being labeled racist last week from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez”s (AOC) chief of staff. Pelosi was having none of it. One of the few times CM has agreed with her. The left is now eating its own.

To take President Trump at his word on the White House lawn – ” if you don’t like our country, leave!” He followed it up with “you’re always welcome back.” Why didn’t the press speak to the whole context? Is it racist to say to people who seem to hate America to leave and live somewhere they’ll be happier?

CM agrees with the sentiment. If people want to firebomb ICE facilities in one border area and hoist the Mexican flag at another on US soil in place of Old Glory, why not leave? If they hate their country that much to do such things, why not move to where they think it is ideal? Perhaps the 100,000s of thousands of people being processed for being illegal immigrants speaks volumes of where people prefer to live. These people just have to open their eyes instead of howl at the moon. They have a democratic choice to turf this supposed dictator next year. If they don’t win, accept not enough think like them.

As former ICE Director Thomas Homan said to AOC, if people want to be processed as asylum seekers they should go to a proper border and go through the legal steps. They’re simply not doing that, most likely because they don’t have reasonable refugee claims as their countries are democracies not at war. They are seeking more favorable economic conditions. Aspirational asylum seekers.

If AOC wants to trash Homan and get proven completely wrong should we not question her incompetence as a lawmaker?

Do we take the words of Rep Rashida Tlaib, “we’re gonna impeach the Motherf*cker” In her victory speech as the type of conduct that invites unity with the people?

Does Rep Ilhan Omar think tweeting that Trump is a “white nationalist” will stop division, heal wounds and cause his base come around? Coming from one who had to walk back her anti-Israel stance she’s hardly speaking from high ground.

How about Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley who said, “We don’t need any more brown faces that don’t want to be a brown voice. We don’t need black faces that don’t want to be a black voice. We don’t need Muslims that don’t want to be a Muslim voice. We don’t need queers that don’t want to be a queer voice.”

So if one strays from Pressley’s predetermined definition of identity – because they wish to be thought of as individuals – are they betraying their roots? How does one create unity with that type of ridiculous thinking? How dare one aspire to not letting stereotypes prevent them succeed.

Of course leftist heads will explode after reading this. While Trunp ‘s tweets are rarely tactful or polite, if these Democrats wish to unite a country, they need a new playbook. Americans are growing sick and tired of the constant leftist drone.

All four are lawmakers. If they can’t prosecute a sounder argument than moping at a press conference what hope have they got? Perhaps taking his words at face value and doing something about it instead of feeling so oppressed in a country that has provided a platform to change what they don’t like. Maybe they should look to the disunity within their own party. They’ll have another 5 years at least to work that out.

Laugh of the day

According to Public Policy Polling (PPP), USWNT Megan Rapinoe would beat Trump in 2020. She doesn’t wish to run as she’s too busy but CM thinks she doesn’t hold mainstream values to win the majority of voters.

Although her potential victory speech on Capitol Hill could be the first to be profanity laden. “To my fellow f*cking Americans.” It might be a safer option than listing each identity group by level of grievance because they’re all the most oppressed in their own eyes…even those suffering under the weight of multi million dollar contracts.

Somehow CM doesn’t think Nancy Pelosi wants another petulant child to deal with. AOC is bad enough.

Great role model for kids

The world’s longest Oscar acceptance speech laced with identity politics which closes with a message for all kids who look to Rapinoe as a role model from the 6:30 mark. All class.