Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, has admitted that the first whistleblower may not testify in person or in writing. It was only several weeks ago that Schiff said the whistleblower was ready to go on record as the pillar of the impeachment hearing. Schiff said on CBS,
“Well, our primary interest right now is making sure that that person is protected … given that we already have the call records we didn’t need the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call.”
The Democrats look like the Keystone Cops running this investigation. If it is such an open and shut case, why are such rookie errors being made? This is what happens when derangement clouds one’s judgment. Unbridled hatred of Trump has removed any sense of coherency in the process.
The Democrats currently have 6 congressional committees investigating Trump. Six. They are looking like a complete laughing stock, once again trying to find a smoking gun where seemingly none exists. The mainstream media was as ever compliant, fuelling their blood lust set off by chronic Trump Derangement Syndrome. Releasing the unredacted phone transcript with Ukrainian PM Volodymyr Zelensky shows once again how Trump always ends up the favourite in a mud-wrestling contest. One would have thought the Democrats would get this by now. Yet they fall for it every time.
If one reads the transcript, it seems that Trump asked about having Zelensky look into the possible shenanigans surrounding the 2016 election and Joe Biden’s son’s alleged corruption with Ukrainian oligarchs in 2015. There are no quid pro quos made, something even the left-leaning NYT admits.
Pelosi seems to have buckled to her party to flip-flop on impeachment. Instead of waiting for the telephone conversation to be released, which Trump promised he’d do, she seems to have acted in haste. Unless she thinks retired Vice Admiral Joseph Maguire’s testimony opens a whole can of worms which could lead to their ultimate wish, as it seems they realise 2020 is sunk by conventional methods.
There is a touch of irony that it is only Tulsi Gabbard, a Democrat presidential nominee who seems to favour the American people deciding rather than a bunch of politicians who haven’t got over the fact that Clinton’s coronation never came to be. Gabbard said,
“I believe that impeachment at this juncture would be terribly divisive for the country at a time when we are already extremely divided. The hyperpartisanship is one of the main things driving our country apart…I think it’s important to beat Donald Trump, that’s why I’m running for president…But I think it’s the American people who need to make their voices heard making that decision.”
Impeachment still requires a 2/3rds vote in the Senate which is highly unlikely in the Republican-dominated upper house. That will require at least 20 Republicans to side with the Democrats to remove Trump. What the call for impeachment will do is likely finish off ol’ Joe Biden from the race. He is far too centrist for the left of the party in any event given it has been hijacked by the hard-left.
Ultimately Trump may relish the thought of a protracted impeachment battle that ends up showing no evidence yet exposing that Democrats as being more intent on pursuing vendettas than helping the very people they’re elected to serve.
One thing is for sure, Americans are growing tired of these antics and impeachment hearings will only make the chance of turfing Trump in 2020 that much harder, despite several Democrat-held states introducing legislation to bar Trump from the ballot paper should he refuse to release his taxes.
As Napoleon Bonaparte once said, “never disturb your enemy when he is making a mistake.“
It seems the left can’t contain their Trump Derangement Syndrome. In Brooklyn, one advertiser has placed mini Trump statues for dogs to urinate on.
The question is with the level sinking ever lower in the way TDS is displayed, do the Dems honestly think they have a chance at the 2020 election with such openly childish antics? It was only last year when a comedian pretended to urinate on Trump’s Hollywood Star.
Imagine if an Obama statue was put out for dogs to urinate on? We wouldn’t hear the end of it.
Sadiq Khan and feminism. What a laugh. His latest “Elle” sponsored video speaks volumes about his double standards. Since when did we turn to Elle and Vogue for in-depth political analysis? The mainstream media has left a void but to think fashion mags have filled the void! Does Khan honestly think that any American voter gives a damn what he thinks about domestic policy? One could be mistaken for thinking he has been watching Gillette commercials on a loop. What a surprise his video has received a 3:1 dislike rating on YouTube.
Did he not see the irony of fawning over a Pakistani political delegation to London at the time Pakistani Christian Asia Bibi was facing execution for blasphemy? Did he fight for the rights of women or Christians or diversity? Did he challenge the visitors? Not a peep.
Why was he silent when prominent Iranian human rights lawyer and women’s rights defender Nasrin Sotoudeh was given 33 years in prison and 148 lashes? She was only fighting for the rights for these women not to wear the hijab. Sadiq uttered not one word.
Where was his defence of comedian, John Cleese, for saying he doesn’t like cultures that believe in female genital mutilation? Yep, you guessed it.Nowhere.
Yet he feels vindicated to make a video about Trump’s views (shared by many Americans) on abortion, which is much more about late term than anything else. Don’t be surprised if pro-life people are disgusted that NY Mayor de Blasio happily lit up monuments and buildings to celebrate terminations right up to point of delivery.
Maybe Mayor Khan is upset with states like Georgia which want heartbeat bills when it comes to abortion. People could still go to another state that practices late term abortion to have the procedure? Did he think of that?
What about the rights of females in the womb who in certain countries get terminated, not because of medical emergencies but the cultural preference to have males? Are you for that?
Let’s look at the stats on abortion because CM guarantees Khan hasn’t a clue even though he professes wokeness.
Let’s look at the stats.
c.700,000 fetuses are terminated in America each year. Down from 1.4 million in 1990. Hardly stats to cheer about. Of course the arguments for a woman’s right to choose will always be thrown at pro-lifers. Yet allowing termination until birth?
Eurostat statistics on abortion reveal that Germany, France, UK, Spain and Italy alone terminate a combined 760,000 fetuses per annum. Across the EU-28 there are 1.25mn terminations. Without getting into a debate on abortion rights, the pure statistical number points to 20.4% of fetuses never make it out of the womb alive.
According to the Guttmacher Institute some 56 million abortions occur annually. Every. Single. Year. Think that WWII saw 50 million deaths in 6 years of conflict with wide spread use of lethal weapons. So abortions kill at a far higher rate than global conflict.
Then he follows with a closing comment that “men and boys should be feminists” and discusses the disproven “gender pay gap” myth suggesting if you believe in gender equality then one is a “feminist“. CM believes in equal opportunity but don’t consider it feminist to believe in fairness. Kristina Keneally doesn’t believe in fairness! She’s happy for men to take a hit to progress her career despite her well known shortcomings.
Sorry Mayor, the data doesn’t support your theories and Trump has never once had a policy platform that discusses the gender pay gap because America focuses on equal opportunity, not equal outcomes. Maybe you should watch Oprah, the highest paid TV host globally. Maybe then see whether Dr Phil has a right to complain why he is not getting equal pay for equal work?!?
While no one can doubt that Trump polarizes opinion, do his detractors honestly think they will win the debate by mowing a giant phallus into a lawn? Will this attempt to (literally) take the moral low ground somehow swing those who hold different opinions?
If the dictator moniker were true he would be the world’s most incompetent executor of such an office. Sadly Trump has between 1.5 and 5.5 years (likely the latter) to remain as DOTUS. Instead of 99% of the population voting for him like a Xi Jinping, Kim Jong-un or Hitler, Trump will likely garner around half. If Americans truly wanted a real dictator they would be better off voting for someone who could get 99%. Sadly democracies don’t operate like that.
The Queen, who long remembers the 80 year relationship which preserved her monarchy, knows that after Trump leaves office, the UK will still continue to have a strong bond with America. Her Majesty won’t resort to petty snubs of its head of state because she feels the need to kowtow to the intolerant mindsets of a few.
Will Americans want to see politicians like Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily Thornberry show such conditional support for American democracy? Did she call for protests when the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia visited? A man with pretty questionable actions regarding journalists in embassies. No she did not.
There are far more effective ways to show courtesy to visiting dignitaries. As CM mentioned yesterday, Trump’s tweets are unstatesmanlike. It doesn’t make Thornberry or Khan’s any better.
Perhaps the Queen is sending the world a message about “the long game.” She probably knows a thing or two about diplomacy as the world’s longest serving monarch. Her state dinner invitation list is the perfect representation of who she feels needs prioritization. What an embarrassment that the UK government did not extend the invite in the first place.
God save our Queen!
History repeats? In the 2016 presidential election Paddy Power paid out on an expected Hillary Clinton win two weeks early. How wrong the betting agency was. How funny to watch the one sided mainstream media switch from 90% chance for Clinton to 98% for Trump. Expensive mistake.
CM has never forgotten watching a Bloomberg screen updating tallied Brexit votes and seeing the betting agencies scramble to cover their completely wrong odds as the count swept through the Midlands.
Now SportsBet has paid out early on a Bill Shorten win over PM Scott “ScoMo” Morrison. $1.3mn in total. A great stunt but this election is about cost of living, not climate change or refugees. Labor is no slam dunk as much as we were led to believe from the string of negative polls.
To be fair this election is so hard to call. The Coalition has been terrible since the Turnbull years but Shorten, for all of the easy ride into the Lodge, has hardly shown himself to be a clear winner. What on earth made him think ScoMo’s thoughts on whether gays would go to hell was even an issue? Now his Treasurer Chris Bowen is telling people not to worry if their largest asset falls into negative equity.
ScoMo has performed very well. Strong on numbers and content. Bill Shorten couldn’t count to save himself. CM only this morning pointed out the ridiculous claims made by Labor MP Richard Marles.
SportBet May yet prove correct but history has been a poor guide in recent years.