#diversityisourstrength

Trolling Trudeau

After it was revealed that ecomentalist Canadian PM Justin Trudeau was using two aircraft (one for him and the media entourage and the other for his luggage) on his campaign trail, opposition leader Andrew Scheer trolled him brilliantly. Hopefully those removal vans are already booked.

#CancelWhitePeople Sarah Jeong dumped by NYT

What irony that The NY Times finally came to the conclusion what the majority knew about potty mouthed Sarah Jeong, albeit 12 months too late. The picture above shows a selection of tweets before she was hired by NYT. Despite that, NYT defended her hire.

CM wrote back in August 2018,

“Was Jeong not aware that 8 of the 12 board of editors are currently white? Not that the board’s racial identity should have any bearing on disgraceful bigotry displayed by her.

The only point at stake here is whether The NY Times will defend and maintain consistent standards it would certainly hold if a white editor raged on about people of other colour. This isn’t a rally or #boycott (please no more boycotts) to get Jeong sacked. On the contrary. In free market thinking the question is whether The NY Times exercises rational judgement and sees that from a commercial perspective defending the indefensible might not be good for growing the business or encouraging a shrinking pool of paying advertisers to rent more space?

After the election of Trump, the newspaper changed its slogan to “The truth is more important now than ever.” For someone to espouse such bitter hatred so candidly in social media forums which have a half life of infinity, her truths are for all to see. The truth in The NY Times’ slogan is also on display.

How could The NY Times possibly hope to uphold the highest levels of ethics and moral high ground by defending her? In her press blurb the paper is effusive with praise citing, “Sarah has guided readers through the digital world with verve and erudition, staying ahead of every turn on the vast beat that is the internet.“ It is also quite telling that Twitter didn’t think she broke the very standards that would see conservative voices banned for far less offensive tweets.

CM wonders what the Harvard Law School has to say about its deeply talented alumni who served as Editor of the Journal of Law and Gender? Perhaps she just missed the ethics classes because she was too busy battling to make sure the correct pronouns were used in the articles on identity politics.”

Now the NYT has terminated her contract. Undoubtedly her contribution was as empty as her Twitter bile. She will now be a contributor, a rather large downgrade from being on the editorial board. She tweeted about the NYT paying attention to subscriber numbers, something the paper might have considered at the start.

Maybe her impact was one which didn’t ring the turnstiles at NYT. It is likely the same reason why The Guardian begs for charity instead of coming to terms with the fact that the content maybe the problem.

Note NYT is offering Aussies an 80% off subscription deal for a year.

School Climate Strikers demand McDonalds

Good to see that kids are still kids. Before demanding we selfish adults take climate action immediately, they obviously need to fuel up on McDonalds, a brand that represents the complete anti Christ of their cause. Dipping nuggets into plastic BBQ sauce bowls, eating from cardboard hamburger boxes and drinking from single use waxed paper cups and plastic straws all stuck in a disposable paper bag.

Tells us all we need to know. The saddest thing is these kids are blissfully unaware of their own hypocrisy.

It is more likely that a McDonalds diet will kill them way before Mother Nature does.

The Ringling Sisters

What a clown show. All four Democrat representatives held a press conference where they made themselves out as helpless, fragile victims. It was all about identity and zero about substance. If they wish to stop division in America they sure have an odd way of showing it.

Isn’t it amazing that in a country supposedly so divided, it still afforded the opportunity for these four minorities to be democratically elected? Surely if it is the racist cesspit they make it out to be there is no chance in hell they’d be where they are today? They’d be stuck under the jackboot of the white supremacists.

Of course anything Trump says is automatically branded racist, bigoted, homophobic, xenophobic or any other form of outrage. Poor old Nancy Pelosi got a taste of being labeled racist last week from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez”s (AOC) chief of staff. Pelosi was having none of it. One of the few times CM has agreed with her. The left is now eating its own.

To take President Trump at his word on the White House lawn – ” if you don’t like our country, leave!” He followed it up with “you’re always welcome back.” Why didn’t the press speak to the whole context? Is it racist to say to people who seem to hate America to leave and live somewhere they’ll be happier?

CM agrees with the sentiment. If people want to firebomb ICE facilities in one border area and hoist the Mexican flag at another on US soil in place of Old Glory, why not leave? If they hate their country that much to do such things, why not move to where they think it is ideal? Perhaps the 100,000s of thousands of people being processed for being illegal immigrants speaks volumes of where people prefer to live. These people just have to open their eyes instead of howl at the moon. They have a democratic choice to turf this supposed dictator next year. If they don’t win, accept not enough think like them.

As former ICE Director Thomas Homan said to AOC, if people want to be processed as asylum seekers they should go to a proper border and go through the legal steps. They’re simply not doing that, most likely because they don’t have reasonable refugee claims as their countries are democracies not at war. They are seeking more favorable economic conditions. Aspirational asylum seekers.

If AOC wants to trash Homan and get proven completely wrong should we not question her incompetence as a lawmaker?

Do we take the words of Rep Rashida Tlaib, “we’re gonna impeach the Motherf*cker” In her victory speech as the type of conduct that invites unity with the people?

Does Rep Ilhan Omar think tweeting that Trump is a “white nationalist” will stop division, heal wounds and cause his base come around? Coming from one who had to walk back her anti-Israel stance she’s hardly speaking from high ground.

How about Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley who said, “We don’t need any more brown faces that don’t want to be a brown voice. We don’t need black faces that don’t want to be a black voice. We don’t need Muslims that don’t want to be a Muslim voice. We don’t need queers that don’t want to be a queer voice.”

So if one strays from Pressley’s predetermined definition of identity – because they wish to be thought of as individuals – are they betraying their roots? How does one create unity with that type of ridiculous thinking? How dare one aspire to not letting stereotypes prevent them succeed.

Of course leftist heads will explode after reading this. While Trunp ‘s tweets are rarely tactful or polite, if these Democrats wish to unite a country, they need a new playbook. Americans are growing sick and tired of the constant leftist drone.

All four are lawmakers. If they can’t prosecute a sounder argument than moping at a press conference what hope have they got? Perhaps taking his words at face value and doing something about it instead of feeling so oppressed in a country that has provided a platform to change what they don’t like. Maybe they should look to the disunity within their own party. They’ll have another 5 years at least to work that out.

How badly do the left want to lose the 2020 election?

It seems the left can’t contain their Trump Derangement Syndrome. In Brooklyn, one advertiser has placed mini Trump statues for dogs to urinate on.

The question is with the level sinking ever lower in the way TDS is displayed, do the Dems honestly think they have a chance at the 2020 election with such openly childish antics? It was only last year when a comedian pretended to urinate on Trump’s Hollywood Star.

Imagine if an Obama statue was put out for dogs to urinate on? We wouldn’t hear the end of it.

Laugh of the day

According to Public Policy Polling (PPP), USWNT Megan Rapinoe would beat Trump in 2020. She doesn’t wish to run as she’s too busy but CM thinks she doesn’t hold mainstream values to win the majority of voters.

Although her potential victory speech on Capitol Hill could be the first to be profanity laden. “To my fellow f*cking Americans.” It might be a safer option than listing each identity group by level of grievance because they’re all the most oppressed in their own eyes…even those suffering under the weight of multi million dollar contracts.

Somehow CM doesn’t think Nancy Pelosi wants another petulant child to deal with. AOC is bad enough.

Nivea CEO – “we don’t do gay”

LGBTQ Nation has reported that Nivea CEO rejected a campaign from its ad agency – FCB Global – which involved two men holding hands with the words, “we don’t do gay at Nivea.” This has led to a social media backlash showing offended users binning their products in protest. The laugh is that the advertising agency wants to dictate to the client how it runs its business. Nivea just doesn’t wish to promote “woke.” A choice that it should be entitled to make, just as Nike or Gillette are.

Nobody asked in what context “we don’t do gay” were said? Was it in reaction to the disastrous Gillette (note P&G reports Q4 results on July 30th) campaign on toxic masculinity? Did Nivea merely not want to reference specific minorities where it didn’t feel sufficient market gaps or opportunities would be found or was it a venom filled homophobic tirade? CM is willing to bet it was the former. Some corporations don’t wish to mix politics with product.

Nivea got in hot water in 2017 when it promoted a skin lightening cream in Africa. After much success with such products in Asia (where lighter skin is deemed more beautiful and brands make a fortune selling cosmetics based on this) it tested the African market. Unfortunately it got into hot water despite demand. The skin whitening industry was $10bn in 2009 and expected to grow to over $23bn by 2020.

Should Nivea be bashed for supplying products to a market demand that clearly exists? If Africans wish to lighten their skin, shouldn’t that just be a question for that individual? No one is forcing Africans to use their products. Nicole Amartefio is rightly proud of her skin hue so she can choose, like many others, not to buy into the ‘insecurity.’ If Nivea sales tank, they can blame the marketing department for inadequate due diligence.

Maybe CM should protest the sunscreen market for heightening insecurities over skin cancer because whites have less melanin? Do people realise that sunglasses lower the risk of tanning because the eyes regulate melanin production based off the glare the eyes receive? Why doesn’t Nivea promote the use of sunglasses instead of selling expensive sunscreen?

However this is where the Nivea story gets stupid.

FCB Global has been Nivea’s as agency for over 100 years yet its CEO Carter Murray said it intends to end the relationship with Nivea at the end of the contract.

FCB is within its rights to bin a century of business development but if the client wants to follow a mainstream campaign rather than get woke, surely isn’t it Nivea’s prerogative to do so? Does it require Nivea to meticulously follow the social diktat of its service providers? Who does FCB Global think it is? Why does it seek to throw its client under the bus? So much for respecting a century old client relationship.

LGBTQ Nation argues that one of the agency staff who proposed the campaign was indeed gay himself. Presumably he was offended.

Sadly Nivea felt the need to make an irrelevant statement to defend something completely unnecessary,

We are an international company with more than 20,000 employees with very different genders, ethnicities, orientations, backgrounds and personalities worldwide…Through our products, we touch millions of consumers around the globe every day. We know and cherish  that individuality and diversity in all regards brings inspiration and creativity to our society and to us as a company.”

Do consumers honestly ask themselves how “woke” every brand they buy? It is not dissimilar to ANZ preaching about Maria Folau. Is that in the forefront of the 5 million customers it serves? That is not even taking into account the hypocrisy of a bank which was admonished by the Hayne Royal Commission for unethical behaviour.

If Nivea believe that advertising to the LGBT community is a winner, let it decide because it has far better information than FCB Global about markets, products and segmentation. It shouldn’t feel guilty. Subaru America ran a campaign that targeted the lesbian community. Clearly the brand felt its market position had to differentiate away from the monsters of Toyota and Honda.

Talk about FCB Global cutting off its nose to spite its face. Expect its business to be affected more than Nivea. #GetWokeGoBroke . Interested to see how Gillette’s Q4 trend has been since the disastrous Q3 when P&G reports.

The moral of the story is to let the free market weigh Nivea’s decisions. It hasn’t called for anything other than defending how it serves its client base. Nivea parent company, Beiersdorf AG, has not experienced a share price backlash.