Diversity

Gender pay gap in US soccer?

US Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand railed at the gender pay gap between the US Soccer men’s team and women’s team after the latter thrashed Thailand 13-0.

Democratic Senator and perennial identity politician Elizabeth Warren also chipped in with her slant on things about how it is high time to address the pay gap!

Former Republican Senator Orrin Hatch asked the U.S. Soccer Federation to “end this two-tiered, gender-based structure that has unfairly discriminated against female athletes.”

Before US senators took to bashing the US Soccer Federation (USSF), a quick look at the Annual Report for 2018 reveals that “expenses” on the national women’s team were higher than the men’s.

By the numbers, women’s expenditure grew 25% to $17.13m in 2018 over the previous year while the men’s slid 35% to $14.63m (down from $22.43m in 2017). While expenditures aren’t completely broken down, one can assume that this adjustment includes paying for performance.

When boiled down, the expenses allocated to the women’s national team came in at 24% of overall expenses in 2018 from 18% in 2017. Men fell from 30% of the total to 20% over the same time period.

Unless multiple men’s team players have been sacked and there are surplus female players the pay gap is probably swinging in favour of the fairer sex. Or could it be that the governing body is exercising good governance?

Whatever it is, even better to see the investment in the youth national team and player development which has risen from $23.2m to $27.4m.

If only female soccer star Megan Rapinoe could casts aside her Trump Derangement Syndrome and sing the national anthem because she’s representing her country.

Not surprising to see own goals kicked by politicians who don’t look at the facts.

Perhaps the US women’s soccer team should address the pay gap between themselves first. Then once that is complete go after the blokes.

Constructive dismissal?

CM’s view on the incompetence of Rugby Australia (RA) is well documented and reconfirmed by Alan Jones in The Australian today. It appears that Israel Folau looks more like a sacrifice to the altar of the sponsor god, Qantas.

Sponsorship money is important to sports teams but it should never get to a point where the sponsored has to make unconscionable decisions to acquiesce their paymasters. It is unethical.

CM has long held issues over Qantas’ flagrant use of shareholder capital to sponsor the CEO’s activism. It is terrible governance.

Remember the acceptance rings ahead of the same sex marriage debate that Qantas pushed so hard on us? The idea was to distribute these acceptance rings (not fully closed) to customers, clients and travellers.

CM supposed if someone were to politely decline to wear one they risked being be branded homophobic, bigoted and summarily ostracized for expressing such views. It might be that they actually support gay marriage but do not wish to express it openly. That is nothing more than a conscious choice, not categorical staunch opposition. Perhaps failure to wear the ring could cause their career takes a turn for the worse all because they don’t comply with group expression i.e. corporate slavery. The team leader who passes them over because they incorrectly assume the employee is a dissenter. That is palpable workplace bullying encouraged by a woke CEO.

What Jones points out is that the ‘wallaby court’ had already decided the outcome before a word was uttered in defence. It appears it was a ‘hearing’ conducted with the deaf.

RA CEO Raelene Castle apparently told Vanessa Hudson, chief customer officer at Qantas,

I updated her on the situation a day after the post and told her that, confidentially, Rugby AU would be working towards a process to terminate Mr Folau’s contract and that Ms Hudson can share that position with Qantas chief executive Mr Alan Joyce. Ms Hudson texted me later that day saying that she had only shared the update with Mr Joyce and he was appreciative of the transparency and he said that a speedy resolution by Rugby AU was paramount.”

This says a lot about Qantas. If it wants to exert control over RA it should acquire it and manage it as a subsidiary.

Yet where was the pushback by RA? It flaked. If it understood the dwindling fan numbers meant it wasn’t connecting to revenue, it might have thought defending Folau might have been its greatest coup and that many non virtue signaling corporates could replace Qantas’ sponsorship.

The culture of RA is self evident. It is not about rugby anymore but a platform for identity politics.No wonder fans are deserting it. CM discusses dwindling fan numbers yesterday, something Jones alluded to. Put simply, the product stinks and that rot permeates from the top. Fans aren’t stupid.

Coach Michael Cheika’s abysmal win/loss record is tolerated because he tows the line of the C-level cabal. So do some of the players who threatened to boycott the team if Folau was allowed to keep playing.What a joke! These virtue signaling players if given the choice to stand by their beliefs or keep their lucrative contracts would choose the latter every time. They sounded just like those Hollywoodcelebrities that threatened to leave America if Trump won the presidency.Hypocrites.

However it only reinforces the reality of the culture within the RA that encourages this type of numb skulled response to pander to the top. If these players wanted to think about faith in context of not selling out core beliefs they could learn muchfrom Israel Folau.

It increasingly looks like the high level breach has been committed by the board in cahoots with Qantas.

As CM mentioned yesterday, perhaps receivership is the best outcome for RA. That way the apparatchiks get cleared out and replaced by people that connect with fans who ultimately pay the keep the lights on at HQ. It isn’t that hard to fix RA’s problems but it will be impossible with a leadership team which seems to support constructive dismissal at the behest of corporates that champion activism rather than principle. Clearly Qantas is the mean “spirit of Australia”

Get woke, go broke.

KK acknowledges gender politics for without it…

…she would not be where she is. She has been a disaster. She led Labor to its worst ever election defeat in NSW. The Libs have been in government ever since. She only got the premiership thanks to the Labor factions which turfed incumbent Premier Nathan Rees mid-term. NSW Premier Gladys Berijklian won in her own right. It can be done with competence.

Keneally was trounced in the Bennelong by-election and has not been elected as a senator in her own right. Her velcro side kick role beside Bill Shorten helped him clutch defeat from the jaws of victory and now Albanese has sunk the fortunes of competent and popular Labor figures Ed Husic and Don Farrell to make way for Keneally’s gender. Progress? Regress.

Is this the way we create inclusion by encouraging exclusion? Why couldn’t Keneally have got thru solely on merit? Everyone (including CM) would have endorsed such a move. Sadly her record is abysmal.

At zero for three, it must be even worse for Husic and Farrell to make way for an inferior candidate who condescendingly praises their sacrifice despite no record to speak of.

No wonder Albanese was so quick to shut down the press conference after she driveled, when he closed with, “we have two ears and one mouth so we should listen more than talk and we’ve done enough talking“. It shows he is not leading a unified ship to bend to such stupidity thinking it is a vote winner.

Labor putting its worst feet forward already

The Labor Party leadership battle was a joke from the beginning. Chris Bowen even thought he was a credible choice after his disastrous campaign and economic policy suite.

Now that they’ve locked in the top spots as no women put their hand up, what is the obsession of Albanese’s team to elevate them to shadow cabinet roles just because of gender? Most men would happily have an all women (shadow) cabinet provided they were more competent than the males they would be promoted above. It doesn’t benefit male or female voters to have incompetent men or women managing their affairs.

Yet, where were all the women stampeding for the Labor leadership role? Why not take advantage of the clear open pathway created by identity politics? Nobody did. Tanya Plibersek was well prepared as the deputy for 5 1/2years to take over but seemingly it wasn’t her time. If Bill Shorten had won the election and keeled over the very next day, one can bet her time would have arrived on an express train. Don’t blame the boys of blocking a path.

Now Albanese wants to promote Kristina Keneally who has the most disastrous track record as a Labor NSW Premier. Her “besties” photo shoots with Shorten with cute Labrador puppies were a drag on his popularity not a boost. Why promote her? To make sure they can match the Coalition for gender on the front bench? It’s clear that some factions within Labor are rightly concerned.

Do politicians honestly think voters care about the genitalia of MPs? Or their sexual proclivity or what faith they preach? They’re fooling absolutely no one.

Every time anyone gets promoted beyond their ability, it shows.

If Albo wants to win 2022 he’d be better off stacking the opposition bench with the best people he’s got. Not settle for gender quotas. All Morrison has done is set the Labor Party up for another 3 years in opposition if he feels outdoing the Coalition on gender equality is where the heart of the electorate lies. It simply doesn’t.

Every successful woman CM has met has got to where she has got without free kicks, leg ups or forced quotas. It is in the reverse a slap in the face to think they’re not up to the task to have to force such quotas in the first place.

Chick-Fil-A becomes 3rd largest fast food chain

Despite progressives trying to boycott the Chick-fil-A food chain because the Southern Baptist COO Dan Cathy publicly opposed same-sex-marriage, American consumers have turned it into the 3rd largest fast-food chain after McDonalds and Starbucks. Store numbers have doubled and revenues tripled over the last decade.

Chick-fil-A states it’s mission is, “To glorify God by being a faithful steward of all that is entrusted to us. To have a positive influence on all who come in contact with Chick-fil-A.”

Chick-fil-A is notable by its closure on Sundays, Thanksgiving and Christmas. So people are well aware ofthis corporate backing its religious beliefs.

CM has always rejected corporates pushing political and societal agendas. To that end they live and die by the sword. In Gillette’s case it was forced towrite down the long term value of the brand due to its toxic masculinity campaign driven by virtue signaling. In Chick-fil-A’s case it seems that customers think the product offering has always been backed by true beliefs from its inception.It’s a big difference.

Some may argue CM is making a doublestandard. Wrong. Chick-fil-A was founded form the beginning on its core beliefs. It was on the menu (pun intended).Gillette on the other hand thought trying to tell customers to be mindful about their toxic masculinity from a position of sponsoring a racing car series with its logo emblazoned across the backsides or super models was not.They thought being woke would win business. In fact it cost them a bundle.

Truth be told, most people probably just want a chicken sandwich and Chick-fil-A don’t ram religious beliefs on their burger wrappers.Gillette’s customers probably just want to shave without being told they shouldn’t be men.

The Footy Show is axed

This is what happens when TV producers think being woke, hip, diverse and inclusive (i.e. politically correct) will woo audiences. Sadly not. Instead of the blokey format that was a staple with The Footy Show fans, identity politics driven warriors were passed the ball to change the format.

The new version of The Footy Show debuted at 193,000 viewers, presumably people giving it a fair go to see the change. However, it quickly slumped to 96,000 in Melbourne to the then lowest print in the show’s long history. Last week hit only 53,000 TV screens. Now the show is being cancelled.

This is what happens when social justice warriors hijack the free market. If TV stations want to boost ratings, they should properly know their clients rather than pander to the left and think they can remove toxic masculinity by live indoctrination.

Married at First Sight (MAFS) would have to be some of the worst TV around but it gets ratings because it is utterly brain dead and people who’ve had a long day can zone out while watching these proms donnas scream at each other with non-PC words.

She should be demoted with immediate effect

And so should her superiors. Our armed forces are being turned into a joke. Commanding Officer of HMAS Albatross, Captain Fiona Sneath, has deemed the 500m walk to the Anzac memorial on Anzac Day too dangerous citing occupational health and safety. These are our brave and proud military personnel who are trained to shoot back in anger if required. CM is sure they’ll cope.

In recent years our armed forces have pushed hard on gender balance (despite strong evidence from the ADF’s own internal audit to say it is dismally failing even more so when targets were lowered), discouraged the words ‘him’ and ‘her’, we’ve banned death symbols, painted finger nails pink for diversity and the Air Force is being asked to think of the roles of women when bombing enemy targets.

The Navy has just raised the white flag of stupidity again. Are our able seamen so poorly trained they can’t walk down a well lit trail?

What do these military chiefs think China must make of all this? To invade Australia, all they’ll need is a couple of terra-cotta warriors and we’ll surrender. Our military chiefs need a major clean out. They are disgracing the proud soldiers that served and continue to serve.