Virtue signaling

Stepping out of the echo chamber

03F6C2A4-E2DF-415E-B0EB-6D67FC00D6C6.jpeg

The Huff Post shows what can happen when a journalist steps out of the echo chamber and reflects on the realities. CM has often said that the liberal mainstream media is its own worst enemy creating narratives when there isn’t one with regards to POTUS. He knows how important he is for their ratings yet they end up taking his bait every time. It is not a question of what one thinks of the president or his policies rather the best way to defeat him is to ignore him. Yet if more mainstream media stepped out of the echo chamber and rationally and deeply analyzed what is going on rather than point to proving he paid a lot of tax or having a meltdown on whether he called KJU  “Rocket man” then the people they wish to sway might actually start  listening.

Regardless of one’s view on the matter, the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel was attacked as the work of an unhinged madman when indeed history proved Bill Clinton, W Bush and Obama all said exactly the same thing. Trump is just actioning  it. Had the mainstream media reported the facts the other presidents showed the same point of view then maybe, just maybe the audience would grow on the merits of balanced journalism. By screaming at the sky and writing the same tired stories that don’t go into any detail is it any wonder even the Huff Post is compelled to write, ‘Sadly, Trump is winning’.

So let’s see whether Huff Post readers pillory Earl Ofari Hutchinson for writing such a piece that doesn’t pander to what they want to hear but challenge their thinking. One would logically think that there is more than enough content to show him up for what they believe him to be even when looked at objectively with context and perspective. CM wrote that his behaviour at the Navaho award ceremony was completely unnecessary. Indeed the Navaho marines present said he’ll be a great president. Regardless, Trump was stupid to attack Elizabeth Warren with a Pocahontas jibe. It lacked class and took away the real meaning of honouring men who not only risked their lives against the enemy but their own side. If these Navaho were at risk of being captured their own soldiers were ordered to kill them.

Which presents an interesting juxtaposition- do the liberals surrender ratings, potential personal remuneration in order to bring him down by starving the very media attention Trump craves or do the remain the very media whores seeking their own fame and glory?

ABC gives yet more reasons to be defunded

3F3961C1-C4B4-457C-9F1D-9971CAF7416A.jpeg

The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) has a charter to be politically unbiased. The public knows it is unashamedly partisan. Yet its overseers (aka the Government) still give funding north of $1bn to the state owned media group without calling it up for what it gets away with. What it passes for ‘free speech’ usually ends up in the climate change, asylum seekers or any other social justice cause it feels strongly about. Yet the charter is not supposed to act as a platform for disgruntled public servants to broadcast their own views on the taxpayer’s purse. The latest saga is the ABC’s JJJ station which broadcasts alternative music. It has decided it won’t be playing the Hottest 100 Countdown on Australia Day because of its political views that it is in reality ‘invasion day.’ There is no problem for each and everyone of those JJJ employees who thinks of Australia Day that way to believe that. It is another to provide a tax payer funded platform to express it.

To put it in perspective, given several Victorian local councils decided several months ago not to host naturalisation ceremonies on Australia Day, one would hope that JJJ has just woken up from the marijuana smoke haze in the studio to realize this fact. Otherwise, why has it taken them so long? Surely if the producers  were savvy enough at JJJ they could have announced their political stunt the week all of the social justice governments were announcing it.

However it is a serious issue. Why is there a need for four taxpayer funded stations in Melbourne? It is a similar story in the other states. The original purpose of the ABC was to fill in for a lack of a commercial alternative, especially for those in the countryside. Now we can all choose to stream Australian radio stations while we’re in Berlin or Caracas if we feel like it. When you look through the stats, JJJ key demographic is 25-39yo but across all time segments except ‘Afternoon’ it struggles for better than 5%. ABC Melbourne caters to pensioners. Is there a need to provide the infrastructure to supply four stations. Surely the rational argument is that a similar number of bodies must be employed to fill the same roles – the producer, technician, the script writer, the news gatherer….even the guard at the front door. Run many of these stations on commercial terms and most wouldn’t pay the cost of operating.

If one believes we must have a public broadcaster then the number of stations should be cut to one, not four. If the private sector can’t see a ‘commercial’ justification for filling the gap it would leave then it is odds on that advertisers aren’t prepared to either. On the flip side if the ABC radio presenters are desired by particular audiences then the private stations will gladly snap them up.

This is not to undermine the efforts of some quarters of the ABC. Some documentaries such as ‘The Killing Season’ or Foreign Correspondent’s expose of the Fukushima reactor were extremely well done. However it is the fact that some in the ABC think they have a right to dispense the billion plus funding on their own political and social causes. Yet who can blame them when the former Communications Minister (now the Prime Minister) is desperate to avoid courting negative media coverage? When a conservative (by name plate) PM is afraid to go on private radio stations with conservative audiences you know this problem of bias at the ABC won’t be going away for a long time, especially after the drubbing the conservatives will get at the coming election.

With a $500bn and rising debt in Australia, we can ill afford frivolous public spending, especially on broadcasting where the ABC ignores its charter so brazenly. We can chose to listen to left leaning or conservative radio stations in the commercial space. We can consume on line any form of media we choose from around the globe. With media now so ubiquitous, what is the ABC offering that is remotely ‘differentiated’ to warrant its existence? None that can be seen.

Tesla is trucking kidding itself

9F628627-5C36-47E9-9796-3885A63591A6

Tesla has bagged 55 orders for the semi so far. Although it is no surprise that no major truck hauling companies have signed up. Funny that. To expect trucking companies who operate under strict cashflow constraints (afterall they’re businesses not wealthy consumers) to give Musk a $200,000 upfront deposit (aka interest free loan) per ‘founder series’ truck is to put in Tesla lexicon – ludicrous. Truck companies, as CM wrote in its 30 reasons why Tesla is likely to be a bug on a windshield, are conservative. They want to see the technology proven in the field before just forking over $150-200,000 and hoping for the best. Were the technology or charging infrastructure to come up short then the whole economic proposition would come unstuck.

The Tesla trucks are roughly 30% to 70% more expensive than diesel trucks which have up to triple the range on full tanks. Many new 2018 diesel models are available now at $120k vs Tesla’s $150k (300mi range) and $180k (500mi range).

If we used the $60,000 more expensive Tesla Semi can to recoup the difference then it will need to be driven 240,000 miles using the $.25/saving per mile vs diesel Tesla number. Some estimates suggest payback in 3-4 years.

One former trucking company planner wrote,

I was surprised when I saw this “two-year” payback period quoted by Musk last week and repeated on the website. Two years? Really? He had just gotten through showing us an operational cost savings of $.25 per mile over diesel.

Well if I am going to pay back the truck I need those savings to equal the purchase price in two years. Well $180,000 divided by $.25 is 720,000 miles or 360,000 miles per year. That is not even physically possible. A truck would have to drive non-stop for 24 hours a day, 365 days a year at an average speed of 41 mph. Subtract out recharging time of 30 minutes every six hours or two hours per day and four hours per day for loading and unloading and the truck must average 54.7 miles per hour for every mile driven. It is impossible to do.

My big trucks ran long trips moving from coast to coast or north to south. I pulled out my records just for the fun of it and my trucks averaged 13,000 miles per month in summer months and under 10,000 in winter months because of weather and tougher loading and unloading conditions. Most trucks ran about 120,000 miles per year maximum even with driver teams. This was due in many cases to operational time limits of over-sized loads (half hour before sunrise until half hour after sunset is mandatory in many states for safety reasons).“

Whether the new Tesla Roadster or Tesla Semi this new deposit scheme is actually more telling than the vehicles themselves. This can be none other than a cash grab interest free loans to keep the thing alive. I salute Musk for his pioneering spirit but playing with the big boys is never easier done than said. Can’t wait to see the cashflow numbers in Q4 reporting early next year. If we get a worsening of this chart beware.

1Teltesla

Perhaps we can also find some amusement in Tesla’s competitor (Nikola) tweets

A54B9F8D-A66A-4275-9BD7-836997284A99.jpeg

When feminism goes too far

6C21B296-4A32-43F6-BFD4-F19CAF51817A.jpeg

Any “person” who is rightfully comvicted of sexual assault should have the book thrown at them with full force. No arguments. However when Teen Vogue journalist and feminist Emily Lindin wrote that there is no problem throwing innocent men out of jobs and destroying their lives through false allegations that takes some beating. Indeed CM warned that the #METOO campaign might indeed turn into a witch hunt ruining the futures of innocent men forced to defend themselves.

Lindin justified her stance by saying “First, false allegations VERY rarely happen, so even bringing it up borders on a derailment tactic. It’s a microscopic risk in comparison to the issue at hand (worldwide, systemic oppression of half the population),

The benefit of all of us getting to finally tell the truth + the impact on victims FAR outweigh the loss of any one man’s reputation…If some innocent men’s reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is a price I am absolutely willing to pay.

Indeed “what” price are you actually paying Emily when it is those innocent men who will actually pay it on your behalf? That’s right she is paying zero. In the process perhaps the innocent man ( and sole breadwinner) who is jailed for sexual assault loses the family house, wife and 3 daughters. That’s right Ms Lindin, you’ve scored 4 own goals in the process.

Perhaps Lindin could have written that she will visit these innocent men and thank them personally for doing jail time all the while she celebrates her feminist buddies committing perjury.

Any person that willingly makes a false allegation should equally have the book thrown at them. Indeed perhaps she should read up on sexual violence committed against men (hugely underreported) but that would run against her loony narrative.

We should be glad she has said this though. Free speech is wonderful in that she expresses such a stupid position that the exposure to sunlight becomes the best disinfectant. Way to go Emily. May more people like you expose how stupid victimhood becomes when you go actively searching for it. To that end there can be no doubt you’ve never been a true victim of sexual assault to say something so preposterous. No real victim of such a crime would ever back what you wrote. After all why would any innocent person who had that stolen from them want anyone else to experience what they did?

Rehabilitation lessons in common sense a must

One has to wonder what rehabilitation services for returning ISIS fighters to Canada would look like? Opposition Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer asked that question of PM Trudeau on what his plan would look like to try to rehabilitate people who went to fight for a group that threw homosexuals off buildings for just being gay, burnt allied fighters alive, sold women and children into slavery and raped countless women among many other crimes committed. Trudeau read from a sheet of paper. On what planet does one have to live on to think that a group that fought against Canadian troops and its allies can seriously reintegrate into Canadian society and honestly reform to the values of Canadians?

Put aside arguments about these individuals being freedoms fighters. These people, some who may have individually committed the crimes aforementioned will come back free to live among Canadians. Does the government honestly think that these people can be, much less want to be “rehabilitated” to understand the wonders of democracy and progressivism? To fight for ISIS and the principles of that archaic ideology are probably as far removed from the liberal ideals that Trudeau espouses. What can be absolutely certain – this will be an absolute waste of taxpayer funds to try to convert those that thought the doctrines of ISIS were something to aspire to. Then again with M-103, every day Canadians are gagged from criticizing these same fighters.

When you boil it all down to gravy, it seems that government needs rehabilitation lessons in common sense.

Thoughts for the day – Group think, crypto and taxi drivers

6FE1E60D-D240-464D-AB5A-E4305B63F7E6

It is important to challenge convention. I have had countless questions from people on bitcoin and crypto lately. Sort of reminded me of the above. Perhaps the golden rule of investing doesn’t lie in complex models and sci-fi scenario analysis but the simple question of whenever an overwhelming majority think something is great, it is time to take the opposing view and vice versa. I haven’t been in a taxi yet to confirm Bitcoin is overdone. As I put it – gold needs to be dug out of the ground with effort. The thing that spooks me about crypto (without trying to sound conspiracy theorist) is that state actors (most top end computer science grads in China end up working in the country’s cyber warfare teams), hackers or criminal minds (did you know 70% of top end computer science grads in Russia end up working for the mob (directly or indirectly) the value of coins in the system could be instantaneously wiped out at the stroke of a key. We’ve had small hiccups ($280m) only last week. So as much as the ‘security’ of these crypto currencies is often sold as bulletproof, none of them are ‘cyberproof’.

Think of why your Norton, Kaspersky or Trend Micro anti-virus software requires constant upgrading to prevent new threats trying to exploit new vulnerabilities in systems. We need only go back to the Stuxnet virus of 2010 which was installed inside computers controlling uranium centrifuges in Iran. The operators had no idea. The software told the brain of the centrifuges to spin at multiples faster than design spec could handle all the while the computer interface of the operators showed everything normal. After a while the machines melted down causing the complete destruction of the centrifuges which were controlled from a remote location.

So much in life is simple. Yet we have lawyers writing confusing sentences that carry on for pages and pages, politicians complicating simple tasks, oil companies trying to convince us their additives are superior to others and so on. The reality is we just have to ask ourselves that one question from Mark Twain,

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.

EU pushes for 40% female representation on company boards

The EU in its infinite wisdom said that it wishes to mandate that company boards achieve a quota of 40% women. Even Germany considers this an overreach (even though its own goal by 2018 is 30%). This EU’s socialist charter to push for affirmative action was challenged in 1981 by Dr Thomas Sowell who completely debunked the myths put forward about the gender pay gap, discrimination and other stereotypes of minimum wage and income inequality. It is truly worth watching the 50 minutes or so of Sowell dispose of lawyer Mrs Pilpell whose weak liberal agenda gets ripped to shreds because is based on a lack of understanding and being loose with facts.

Don’t mistake the position of CM. If based on merit then have 100% female boards should they outqualify men. So assume that boards hit 40% women then what next? Should we hire a minimum percentage of LGBT, minorities, religious groups or disabled people to run companies? Since when should gender, sexual orientation, race, religion or disability be a bigger factor than capability  in running company boards? Shareholders expect one thing – returns. The Sydney Morning Herald wrote a puff piece on those boards without women on them underperforming. CM proved the hypothesis false.

CM wrote with respect to the SMH’s false assertion, “Note that the twenty companies listed in the article have the following 1yr and 3yr relative performance (i.e. vs. ASX 200). Note on an unweighted average over these 1 & 3 year periods, these chauvinistic men’s clubs outperformed the broader index by 22.7% and 89.9% respectively.”

Once again, gender ought to have nothing to do with it. Every ambitious, hard working female that has become truly successful in a man’s world never complained at any disadvantages they may or may not have had. They never played the woman card and I absolutely admire them to this day. One is a mentor some 18 years after we first met. So shouldn’t it be an insult to industrious women like her to see less hungry females given unfair advantages that weren’t earned through individual merit and effort like she had to endure to get there?

Yet such diversity programs designed to remove inherent biases in the system actually create the very discrimination it is designed to stop. All that matters is diversity of thought and if that happens to be women that provide that wisdom sign me up as a shareholder of every corporation that does so on merit. Listen to Dr Sowell – it is truly intelligent stuff. Poor Mrs Pilpell.