Industrial

Shaving bliss without “irritation”

Thanks Gillette. Now this Schick Hydro5 razor promises to keep away skin irritation. For customers it’s even nicer to know there are no other “irritations” to worry about.

Schick should do a toxic masculinity counter campaign

Gillette’s marketing department must be thrilled to get such decent click thru rates. Sadly they are running circa 10:1 negative on 2.4m views. Great lesson on why lecturing customers is never advisable. Were they eating Tide pods when they came up with the idea?

This virtue signaling stupidity only benefits Edgewell Personal Care (parent of Schick). On what planet did Gillette think this campaign would win fans? If CM was working for Edgewell, the advice to the company would be to do a toxic masculinity spoof counter campaign and watch it go so viral. Watch EPC’s share price ramp tonite.

It’s rare that a #1 player so carelessly throws away its clear advantage. The overwhelming majority of men can’t stand violence toward women.

As is so often the case with virtue signaling the target audience is usually such a tiny minority that one wonders why they bother to spurn the majority to placate them?!

Gillette – the best a man could get

Queue yet more corporate driven politically correct garbage in an attempt to shame customers with respect to the #METOO bandwagon. In the 35 odd years CM has been shaving, not once have I reflected that a 3-day growth over the weekend is somehow fueling my inner toxic male. Were the real motives for my Movember antics designed to raise awareness around male suicide or actively triggering my inner misogynist?

Did the Gillette marketing team actually research facts or consult a handful of hairy arm pitted feminists in the internal coffee lounge? Since when did Gillette become the self imposed arbiter of public morality?

As far as CM is concerned you’ve lost a customer. I’m in need of a new razor so look forward to using Schick from here on. Hopefully it won’t use its brand to issue sermons completely unrelated to anything I or 99% of men who have proved over millennia they’ll gladly put their lives on the line to protect the fairer sex. To be clear, CM is not for a second asking people to #boycottgillette. That’s up to individuals to choose. The message to Gillette is to keep your politics to yourself. Stop politicizing razor blades, especially at the prices charged.

Imagine if the Titanic’s heavily bearded Captain Smith decided to let toxic masculinity take charge and let all the women and children drown in the Atlantic? Surely in the interests of equality countless men needn’t have died. Where are the feminists praising his sacrifice?

Toxic masculinity is the new buzzword. In April last year, CM wrote of the University of Texas claiming deep mental health issues were driven by men being men.

Seems a bit odd in the struggle for gender identity and equality that only masculinity is deemed a problem.  “MasculinUT” is being organized by the school’s counseling staff and most recently organized a poster series encouraging students to develop a “healthy model of masculinity.” The program is built around “restrictive masculinity” and tries to encourage men to drop traditional gender roles to “act like a man”, be “successful” or “the breadwinner.” Arise the unsuccessful breadlosers. The question is whether the UT Counseling and Mental Health Center (CMHC) will offer post-graduation counseling when these students realize the real world doesn’t operate that way?

In 2017 CM wrote about the domestic violence stats against men.

“The US National Intimate Partner Sexual Violence Survey (NIPSVS)conducted in 2010 showed that 25 million men had claimed they were victims of some form of sexual violence by an intimate partner or acquaintance. Shocking to be sure but the statements in a rather one-sided piece from Heather Jo Flores in The Independent with respect to Me Too.  were of particular interest:

Men, it’s not our job to keep reminding you. Remind each other, and stop abusing. It’s as simple as that. Until men speak out against men who abuse, this will never stop. How about y’all post “I ignored it and I won’t anymore” instead? Because #hearyou doesn’t cut it. Just hearing us doesn’t cut it. Taking action, speaking out, and showing zero tolerance for abuse is the only way through. Silence enables. Be the change..So why do men need to have multiple victims come forward before anybody says a damn thing”

If Flores opened her eyes she might see that we are exactly as she claims we are not.  For much of the utter rubbish men may brag about amongst themselves (e.g.bro-culture), talking up how they conducted street justice is never one of them. Take a look at the multiple social experiments on domestic violence which show random men stepping up to defend women they have never met who look to be in trouble. (Even former Australian PM John Howard intervened in a domestic violence situation last week aged 79). That is taking action. Immediate. No looking the other way. Men are hardwired to protect women. It is instinctive. Far from toxic. In the reverse, no one defended the male being attacked in the same video. If anything males smirked, some feeling sorry for him, 

CM is reading Jordan Peterson’s ‘12 Rules for Life’ at the moment and the opening chapter logs the behaviour of male vs female species in nature. Lobsters are about as toxic as one can imagine when it comes to masculinity and femininity. 750mn years of evolution. Same patterns that are hard wired.

Perhaps Gillette should dispense with nasty climate change inducing steel razors wrapped in plastic and invest in a line of hormone blocking drugs that prevent facial hair growth. That way they could prevent toxic masculinity and sterilize men at the same time.

Sydney Harbour Bridge is falling down?

CM is no construction engineer but this bridge expansion joint on the right (under the south side of the Cahill Expressway 100~150m before it veers left across Circular Quay) is looking rather sickly. While the top has a ball joint and the bottom leading edge looks to have a beveled surface to allow some flex/give to the structure above, it looks as if it has been sitting in that position for quite some time. Simple physics around force distribution at odd angles and metal fatigue data on a 60yr old part might be worth checking.

Averaging 30,000-40,000 cars a day and a dedicated bus lane means it gets a regular pounding. NSW RMS Minister Melinda Pavey has been informed of it.

Doing what it says on the tin

How often do we buy products that don’t do what they claim? In the case of “Start ya bastard” it is a question of whether they spent more on the marketing than the R&D. Let’s hope the compelled speech brigade don’t attack this Aussie icon! CM is sure Nulon can make some fruitier arguments to protect the brand.

What do the Yellow Vests want? Frexit is one demand

No automatic alt text available.

Here is the Gilets Jaunes’ (yellow vests) List of Demands. Note Frexit is one of them! CM wholeheartedly agrees on the stance on education and barring lobby groups from political circles. Note the demands with respect to banning migratory flows of those who cannot integrate with French values. Where have we heard this before?

President Macron should hope he has an invisible cloak in his wardrobe. So much for more globalism. Yet another sign of a European member state demanding nationalist interests be put before federal EU rule.

Will the mainstream media objectively report on the growing number of nations wanting to put themselves first? Or will they spin the story that the demands from nations like France are somehow different to that of the abhorrent views held by the monster in the Oval Office?

Economy/Work

  • A constitutional cap on taxes – at 25%
  • Increase of 40% in the basic pension and social welfare
  • Increase hiring in public sector to re-establish public services
  • Massive construction projects to house 5 million homeless, and severe penalties for mayors/prefectures that leave people on the streets
  • Break up the ‘too-big-to-fail’ banks, re-separate regular banking from investment banking
  • Cancel debts accrued through usurious rates of interest

Politics

  • Constitutional amendments to protect the people’s interests, including binding referenda
  • The barring of lobby groups and vested interests from political decision-making
  • Frexit: Leave the EU to regain our economic, monetary and political sovereignty (In other words, respect the 2005 referendum result, when France voted against the EU Constitution Treaty, which was then renamed the Lisbon Treaty, and the French people ignored)
  • Clampdown on tax evasion by the ultra-rich
  • The immediate cessation of privatization, and the re-nationalization of public goods like motorways, airports, rail, etc
  • Remove all ideology from the ministry of education, ending all destructive education techniques
  • Quadruple the budget for law and order and put time-limits on judicial procedures. Make access to the justice system available for all
  • Break up media monopolies and end their interference in politics. Make media accessible to citizens and guarantee a plurality of opinions. End editorial propaganda
  • Guarantee citizens’ liberty by including in the constitution a complete prohibition on state interference in their decisions concerning education, health and family matters

Health/Environment

  • No more ‘planned obsolescence’ – Mandate guarantee from producers that their products will last 10 years, and that spare parts will be available during that period
  • Ban plastic bottles and other polluting packaging
  • Weaken the influence of big pharma on health in general and hospitals in particular
  • Ban on GMO crops, carcinogenic pesticides, endocrine disruptors and monocrops
  • Re-industrialize France (thereby reducing imports and thus pollution)

Foreign Affairs

  • End France’s participation in foreign wars of aggression, and exit from NATO
  • Cease pillaging and interfering – politically and militarily – in ‘Francafrique’, which keeps Africa poor. Immediately repatriate all French soldiers. Establish relations with African states on an equal peer-to-peer basis
  • Prevent migratory flows that cannot be accommodated or integrated, given the profound civilizational crisis we are experiencing
  • Scrupulously respect international law and the treaties we have signed.

Sir David’s 22,000 disciples won’t be able to sustain frequent flyer mile status

Yes Sir David Attenborough, we’re doomed if we look at history of the very people in place to save us. Not withstanding the 22,000 climate change disciples who have flown to Katowice, Poland to pay homage at the altar of the UNIPCC to cling on to each other hearing about their inevitable extinction. What a shame that instead of embracing technology and live-streaming COP24 to help us mitigate impending disaster, government funded frequent flyer mile status of climate apparatchiks takes precedence to saving us from all of these dangerous CO2 emissions.

Apart from the 100% certainty of me being screened for explosives at Sydney Airport (yet again today), the other is that the growth in air travel suggests that more and more people are happy to save the planet, provided that someone else offsets on their behalf. CM has long argued this position. Our consumption patterns dictate the “true” state of care of the environment. It hasn’t stopped SUV sales dead in their tracks and last year the IATA forecast that the number of airline passengers is set to DOUBLE by 2030.  Hardly the actions of those frightened by climate change.

Oh but you can offset your carbon footprint! In its 2017 Annual Report, Qantas boasts,

We have the world’s largest airline offset program and have now been carbon offsetting for over 10 years. In 2016/17, we reached three million tonnes offset.”

Carbon calculators tend to work on the assumption of 0.158kg CO2/passenger kilometre.

In the last 10 years Qantas has flown around 1 trillion revenue passenger kilometres. While the literature in the annual report denotes one passenger offsets every 53 seconds, the mathematical reality is simple – 2% of miles are carbon offset. So that means that 98% of people couldn’t care less. Would dispensing with frequent flyer programs cut emissions? These loyalty programs by their very nature encourage more travel. The more you fly the more you can fly for free!  Surely the IPCC should scream for a ban here. Dispense with first, business and premium economy to maximise passenger loads each flight. Apologies for the preamble.

While the US is not a signatory to Paris, 19 of the G20 are. The irony is that the non-signatory nation has seen its total emissions fall while many of the others have not. What value the ink on a pledge? No sooner had President Macron thrown stones at America, that he’s backed down and postponed a fuel tax hike for 6 months to save his city from burning down. There it is in a nutshell. We’re told if we don’t act now we’re doomed. So 6 months is a long time in “immediate” speak. What we do know this is classic smoke and mirrors by Macron. In 6 months the fuel tax will be all but forgotten. Virtue signaling Exhibit A scrapped. Why doesn’t anyone in the media pick on China? It has promised to increase emissions out to 2030 and is a signatory.

Sir David should get cold chills lifting a rock on the recent saga surrounding the NATO signatories where we can learn how worthless pen strokes can be. In 2006, NATO Defence Ministers agreed to commit a minimum of 2% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to defence spending. This guideline, according to NATO,  “principally serves as an indicator of a country’s political will to contribute to the Alliance’s common defence efforts.” In 2017, only 5 of the 28 members outside the US have met the 2% threshold – Greece, Estonia, UK, Romania & Poland in that order. Despite Greece’s economic problems elsewhere, it manages to honour the deal. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said “the majority [not all] of allies now have plans to do so by 2024.” 3 more are expected to hit the target in 2018. So for all the good will in the world, is POTUS wrong to call the other 19 members slackers that ride off the US taxpayer when so many of them are only likely to hit the target 18 years after ‘committing’ to it?

Alas, who doesn’t want to breathe clean air? The question is once all of the hysteria of 100m sea rises, forest fires (sharply down from 70 years ago & 90% caused by arson or accidents), hurricanes (nothing extraordinary in the data to show increases in ferocity) or sinking islands (sorry 80% of Pacific atolls/islands are stable or rising) are properly analysed what is the most efficient way to get there? Even Turkey wants to be downgraded to a developing nation in order to benefit from wealth redistribution on climate.

What a masterstroke if signatories to Paris are prepared to take on America’s share of saving the planet. American taxpayers can feel happy in the knowledge that other nations are paying for their NATO commitments by rebating them with tax credits on climate, all the while ruining their domestic competitiveness along the way.  Why does Trump need to Make America Great Again, when the majority of nations are prepared to do it for him? Economist Paul Krugman shouldn’t be calling climate skeptics “sinners” but “saints”