Journalism

If Trump is so stupid how come the media keep getting fooled? Now they demand an insurance payout

IMG_0672.JPG

I used to read Der Spiegel. I even paid for a subscription but eventually the journalism lost its edge. This week’s article calling for Trump’s removal makes my decision sound. Read the following section several times and honestly ask yourself is this journalism? Put aside personal views of the President and objectively look at what the article ‘Donald Trump is a menace to the world’ written by Klaus Brinkbäumer is suggesting, if not demanding.

“He is a man free of morals. As has been demonstrated hundreds of times, he is a liar, a racist and a cheat. I feel ashamed to use these words, as sharp and loud as they are. But if they apply to anyone, they apply to Trump. And one of the media’s tasks is to continue telling things as they are: Trump has to be removed from the White House. Quickly. He is a danger to the world.”

So how would you suggest we do it? No, that is not an option. Should we ignore the democratic process by which he was elected?  Should we ignore the fact that even if he was a ‘liar, a racist and a cheat’ people voted in full knowledge of all of his ‘pussy grabbing antics’? The problem with this type of article is that it ignores reality on so many fronts. As I’ve written many times, if you are not a citizen of a country your input on their citizens’ voting intentions is irrelevant. Essentially what you are pleading for is the same as making a willingly high risk investment in a stock which goes bust then complaining to your broker you were misled and ask for your money back.

Elections are much like stock markets. Your voting intention is akin to investing in your country. In the case of America you had two stocks to choose form. One was the hedge of the other. If you wanted to reinvest in the diminishing returns of the last 40 years you bought Clinton Inc. If you wanted to bet on higher risk with potentially higher high return with a start up you voted for Trump Corp.  The media were slimeball stockbrokers trying to persuade investors (voters) to buy into the safety of Clinton Inc because they knew that the commission pay-off would be larger for them. However investors had enough of struggling through decades of exceptional losses, downgrades, dividend cuts and incompetent CEOs. Even worse they got sick and tired of the shareholder meetings where CEO Obama would talk about how successful his stewardship had been when an increasingly dissatisfied shareholder base kept on checking their statements and questioning the dud investment let alone disapproving of his suggested successor.

Mr Brinkbaumer, your article is exactly the problem with the media. You claim the media’s task is to ‘continue telling things as they are’ but you’ve failed on so many levels so many times that your trust rating is even lower than President Trump which stands in the early 40% range. The problem is that the only insurance you can buy in politics is the opposition. None other exists because the premiums would be too high and the payouts too low.

What your article painfully overlooks is that had the previous mob, who no doubt you think is the solution, was actually the problem. That 40 years of painful neglect led to record numbers on welfare, food stamps and income inequality. The investors knew that backing Clinton Inc, whose entire manifesto spoke to helping the needy that had been neglected by her own party (by deduction including the man she intended to replace), was such a palpable untruth that had the Democrats so brazenly lied in a stock prospectus she would really have been jailed.

After Comey’s decision to testify, my social media feeds lit up like a Christmas tree. I deliberately held back from making any call at the time because there was no evidence other than speculation. Yet social media had already made up its mind – “impeachment! – the orange buffoon is going down!” “The smoking gun!” Of course it turns out that the knee-jerk reaction was proved a falsehood. The media once again let its subjectivity rule the day. Like Rachel Maddow’s scoop on his taxes. She sold it as grounds to get him on tax evasion like Al Capone in The Untouchables. She essentially said “we’ve got the book keeper.” Yet she was gunned down in the elevator by her own leftist journos. You know when the media attacks its own that even it from time to time has flashes of objectivity, albeit too brief because lessons are never learned.

Sadly for the rest of the world, as much as we may despise Trump (he has flaws) and protest at his actions we have absolutely no rights to lynch a democratically elected President much less encourage his downfall. This type of reckless behavior is indeed more disturbing. It essentially says you don’t respect the democratic rights of Americans. What is worse is it the same downright condescending attitude people had during the elections that completely ignored the plight of those that voted for him remains. I remember reading one article suggesting that there be an intelligence test required to have voting rights.  That is totalitarian behaviour if there ever was!

The leftist media continues to forget that the one sure way to help him do another 4 years is to keep up the same broken record dialogue. Indeed in the next 3+ years the Americans will have the opportunity to sack him if indeed they see a better alternative. Trump was always the start-up IPO bet. American voters knew full well he was a risk and they took it. His volatile stock performance is not a big surprise.

Klaus, you conveniently forget that Trump is a by-product of decades of neglect. Had the past four decades of the incumbent political class done a sound enough job he never would have seen the light of day. Instead of putting blame on the causes you simply place it all on him. Instead of some introspection on asking why he is where he is you can’t remove yourself from the group think of attack dogs. That anything he may achieve will be discredited and anything he does wrong will be given full thermonuclear uranium tipped coverage. That my dear friend is shame on you.

It would be nice to see some balance in coverage because if you don’t social media will drag up example after example for you further discrediting your supposed ‘telling things as they are’. We must all remember that digital media has a half-life of infinity. Is it any wonder 25% of the workforce in media has been culled in recent years. It isn’t that advertising revenues are falling it is because you don’t provide enough value for advertisers to warrant posting ads in your publication. Guaranteed if the journalism attracted readers the ad revenue would climb with it.

So once again, the bigger danger to the world is you not him. We should never encourage the overthrow of democratically elected governments because we dislike the outcome. Don’t forget that Clinton had 99% of the mainstream media on her side, leaked debate questions to give her an advantage, a pussy-grabbing video against her opposition and more but still lost. Why? The attitude of expecting a coronation and frankly Hillary Clinton didn’t put in the work.

Suppose no dirt is found on Trump? That constant media mud slinging fails to stick. Evidence surely that maybe he is just a brash, uncouth, narcisstic bully rather than someone that must be removed as a danger to the world. Sure, he doesn’t exactly act in a manner very befitting of the most powerful office in the world but he got there legitimately.  Indeed if he is as unhinged as you imagine surely Pyongyang would be under a mushroom cloud and Assad would be a victim of SEAL Team 6. In fact you might point out that the incredible weakness of his predecessor on foreign policy makes Trump’s more assertive stance a welcoming relief rather than a terrifying prelude to WW3.

Your article is so typical of the snowflake culture. The type of attitude that seeks to ban people from making addresses at universities, once the cradle of free speech. You ignore what you don’t want to hear and pass judgement on those who fail to hear you. Once you learn to listen to others you may find that you come to understand why even people like Van Jones can eventually see why Trump won’t be outed so easily. For indeed if he is as big a fool as everyone makes out the media won’t be needed to point it out. It will be painfully clear and in 2018 Americans will get a trial IPO and 2020 the opportunity to buy or sell stock in Trump Corp.

I should thank you for this article for helping confirm why I didn’t bother renewing my subscription.

Comey testimony proves media can’t stop playing the man rather than the ball

IMG_0114

Comey admitted in his testimony that he was never pressured by Trump to end any investigations. Damn and blast. The media has done another collective Rachel Maddow “we’ve got his tax returns” backfire. So insistent on trying to seek revenge they forgot the old Chinese proverb, “before setting out on revenge, first dig two graves.” So eager are they to play the man they overlook basic check sheets to find balance. Trump may well be a loose cannon at times but the media is the pot still calling the kettle black.

While I long argued Trump would win the election I’ve been an advocate of trying to seek balance to the one sided argument against him. It doesn’t mean I think he is ideal.  I disagree with many (not all) things he has done and petty things (like his attitude to Merkel) are certainly not fitting the most powerful office in the world. Trump derangement syndrome is none-the-less real. The media attack dogs never seek to do moral equivalence with their beloved Obama over the same supposed crimes of leaking sensitive info or whatever. I do think Trump is Turnbull-esque in lacking judgement as well as constant cabinet reshuffles but the most twisted irony is that financial markets would seem to want him there using any wobble on the back of an impeachment scenario as an excuse rather than admit the hyper asset bubble blown for 8 years.

The mainstream media now preys on clickbait. Thinking the number of clicks, likes and shares are endorsements and can replace quality content (as much as they self appraise it’s high value added factual). In fact the revenue numbers of media outlets who continually rant  is telling. Fairfax in Australia has had two rounds of layoffs in the space of 12 months and The Guardian is openly begging for donations.

The media is surely going to keep launching salvo after salvo to try get him out of office. As stupid as they keep suggesting the ‘orange baffoon” is he keeps getting their measure. I issue a caution though. The deplorables that voted him in want him to get on with the job. With all these distractions the quest that they hope will get them under the “have not” hole is pushed further into the future. Getting an impeachment to stick and force a resignation is not high on a have not’s priority list. They need help as I argued at the time of the election. Whether Trump can provide it is a moot point but they voted for change and the “haves” ought to be careful how they indirectly impact the “have nots”

The screaming, carrying on and promoting blood sport may end up creating proper civil unrest. It’s simmering but the media as usual is oblivious to it all. In any event the last thing the world needs is instability in the world’s largest economy at this point in a peaking cycle.

The McTurnbull Burger – 2017 budget that says ‘waistline be damned!’

mcturnbull

Remember the Big Mac jingo? “Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles,  onions on a sesame seed bun?”  Well the 2017 budget From the Coalition might as well be called the super sized McTurnbull Burger. Two all thief parties, special porkies, levies, fees, spun on a $600bn dollar bomb. While the government needed to introduce a vegan budget of lentils, tofu and alfalfa to get the country’s nutrition properly sorted they’ve said waistline be damned. Morgan Spurlock couldn’t keep up with this super sized meal. As my wise sage Stu told me last week, “About as well-timed as Mining Super Profits tax – ding ding ding – top of the banking cycle just called by inept bureaucrats”

If people wanted a tax and spend party they’d have voted Labor. In a desperate attempt to supersize the meal they’ve made of the economy since Turnbull took office the debt ceiling will be raised. Wage growth has slowed for the past 5 years from 4% to under 2% according to the RBA. Throw higher Medicare on top why not?!. Cost of living is soaring. So let’s look at the extra calories they’ll inevitably load on the taxpayer.

1) Let’s tax the big 4 banks. That’ll work. What will they do as responsible shareholder owned organizations? Pass those costs straight on to the tapped out borrower where 1/3 mortgagees already under strain and 25% odd have less than a month of buffer savings. NAB already jacked interest only loans 50bps.

2) allowing retirees to park $300,000 tax free into super if they downsize their empty nest. Wow! So sell your $5mn waterfront property so you can park $300k tax free into superannuation. Can see those Mosmanites queue up to move to Punchbowl to retire. Hopefully the $1mn fibro former council shack the Punchbowl pensioner flips will mean they can move to a $500,000 demountable in Casula in order to free up the property market for the first home buyer who is getting stung with higher interest rates, .

3) Australia has a property bubble. The Reserve Bank has recently had an epiphany where they’re afraid to raise rates to crash the housing market and they can’t cut because they’ll fire it up more. Allowing creative superannuation deposit schemes (max $30,000 per person & $15k/year) to help with a deposit only doubles down on encouraging first home buyers to get levered up at the top of the market using a system designed to build a safety net for retirement. When governments start abusing sensible policies in ways it was never designed for then look out for trouble down the line. This doesn’t help first home buyers it just pushes up the hurdle to enter.

4) Australia’s credit rating is on the block. Australia’s main banks are 40% wholesale financed meaning they have to go out into the market unlike Japanese banks which are almost 100% funded by their depositors. Aussie banks could see a rise in their cost of funds which the RBA could do little to avoid. That will put a huge dent in the retail consumption figures.

5) speaking of credit cards. Have people noticed that average credit card limits have not budged in 7 years. If banks are confident in the ability of consumers to repay debt, they’d let out the limits to encourage them to splash out! Not so – see here for more details.

6) Infrastructure – I live in the land of big infrastructure. Jobs creation schemes which mostly never recover the costs – especially regional rail. The Sydney-Melbourne bullet train makes absolute sense. We only need look at the submarines to know that waste will be a reality.

7) small business – tax concessions of $20,000 not much to write home about. Small businesses thrive on a robust economy which is unlikely to occur given the backdrop. Once again this budget is based on rosy assumptions and you can bet your bottom dollar Australia won’t be back in surplus by 2021.

Some  media are talking of Turnbull & Morrison stealing the thunder of the Labor Party, providing a budget more akin to their platform. Sadly I disagree that this legitimizes Turnbull. It totally alienates his base, what is left of it. Tax the rich, give to the poor. Moreover voters see through the veneer. The stench of the Coalition is so on the nose that without ditching Turnbull they have no chance of keeping office. Labor is not much better and One Nation and other independents will hoover up disaffected voters by effectively letting the others dance around the petty identity political correctness nonsense.

In the end the McTurnbull Burger meal will look like the usual finished product which resembles nothing like the picture you see on the menu. A flattened combination of squished mush, soggy over-salted fries and a large Coke where the cup is 90% ice. Yep, the Coalition has spat between your buns too. This is a meal that won’t get voters queuing up for more. Well at least we know Turnbull remembers that smiles and selfies are free after all ‘he’s lovin’ it‘! After all virtue signaling is all that matters. All this to arrest some shoddy poll numbers which will unlikely last more than one week.

Over 10.6 million Frogs want to jump out of the EU’s boiling pot

IMG_9058.JPG

While the media and the EU will no doubt be jumping for joy they’ll overlook the fact that over 1/3rd of the French who voted, or over 10.6 million, want to jump out of the EU’s boiling pot. Think about that number – over TEN POINT SIX MILLION.  Le Pen’s father only managed slightly better than 5mn or 17.8%. Macron won convincingly (Twitter follower growth ratio accurate again) although one can hardly call 1/3rd of a population backing a far-right nationalist something to celebrate.  It is a damning figure. Period.

The extent of the Le Pen gains should be viewed by the EU as a terrible omen. However many of the Brussels brigadiers have ignored it already as their tweets make painfully clear.

After losing 15 out of 15 referendums against it  the EU desperately needs reform. The Dutch election was still a strong win for Wilders and Rutte only saved seats by adopting a more anti-EU stance. The pro-EU Dutch leftists were slayed. The Swiss recently handed back their long standing invite to join the EU. The Austrians almost voted in the far right FPO and after Greens President van der Bellen recently said all women may be obliged to wear the hijab to show cultural sensitivity they may well think to do that next time. The right wing Sweden Democrats are well ahead in the polls looking to win the 2018 election. The Italians are on the way to vote in the eurosceptic M5S party as their referendum last year on parliamentary reform became a free kick to boot out the establishment. Hungary’s Orban has had enough of the EU’s directives on migrants. Greece is being forced to sell its assets in order to secure another bailout and submit to being a Brussels’ (Berlin?) protectorate despite the EU bending over backwards with the help of Goldman’s creative accountants to get the Greeks into the club. This will not end well as Greece has 37% poverty, 58% youth unemployment and a soaring suicide rate. Now almost 10.5mn French now think the EU is not working. Brexit anyone?

The problem with elections is that even though Macron will serve 5 years, over 1/3rd of his citizens are not happy with the state of terrorism, unemployment and the EU. If Macron doesn’t solve for these problems, Le Pen’s 2022 chances grow and she’s already calling for a radical overhaul of Front National.

The press was making Macron to be a tough negotiator on Brexit. Let’s not forget that the ranting Jean-Claude Juncker has had to be brought into line by Angela Merkel and Donald Tusk over his Brexit negotiations skills (or lack there of). EU lawyers have said the other day that the  €100bn Brexit bill has no legitimacy. The U.K. Local council elections should speak volumes of May’s mandate to pursue full strength hard Brexit.

Macron’s win buys the EU time. Nothing else. In fact the truest test of how petrified the EU truly is can be summed up like this. If they were supremely confident in their own legitimacy there would be no need for the constant self-reaffirmation and shouting from the roof tops about what a great place it is. If indeed it was so, democracy would endorse them every time. As it stands the self-praise would even make Barack Obama blush.

Are you telling me you wouldn’t accept $400,000/hr?

IMG_9055.JPG

It is not often I write about Obama in positive terms but this time I must. $400,000 for a one hour speech to Wall Street is the price they’re willing to pay. If you’re reading this, throw away your prejudices and political affiliation and ask yourself point blank “if I was offered $400k as a speaking fee, would I take it?” I’m guessing most of you would. You can call Obama a sell out or whatever for speaking to those he despised but he is not dissimilar to any other world leader cashing in on the speaker’s circuit. Bill Clinton must be beside himself at being 50% off Obama’s rates or is that there is a bubble in public speaking?

Democrat Senator Elizabeth Warren was outraged at how Obama could be so out of touch with battlers. What a shame the Democrats didn’t figure out the mass increase in poverty, welfare and wealth divide over his 8 years, not to mention previous administrations.  The signs have been there for ages.

The sad fact is that being POTUS gives a huge wealth of opportunities, whether it be wakebording behind Sir Richard Branson’s mega yacht in the Bahamas or generous pay packets after dinner speeches after office.

Why would an investment bank pay $400,000 for Obama? Simple. The bank gets to invite all the top drawer C-level management clients which hopefully leads to multi million dollar transactions.

We can bitch and moan at the levels of hypocrisy or acccept that centuries if not millennia of business practice has been done this way. Influence is everything. Relationships are everything. It’s not what you know but who you know.  Surely kings in ancient times were showered with presents and favours by local lords pressing for greater influence to dominate other lords. In some cultures marrying one’s offspring off to more influential circles was deliberate attempt to gain favour. The Clinton Foundation made an industry out of pay-for-play. Why are we surprised?

I’ll be the first to argue that the gap between the haves and have nots has reached unsustainable levels but do not expect that Obama will worry about that. What worries me is we have a system where too many ‘have nots’ are living like ‘haves’ (e.g. Australia’s housing boom where mortgage debt:GDP is 180%) in this low interest rate world meaning risk is priced at next to nothing when in reality  it should come with a high visibility vest and flashing LEDs warning of its toxicity, flammability and volatility.

How is the imbalance redressed? That is not an overnight affair. With poverty levels around the world at all time highs, debt at record levels, deficits at unsustainable levels and public service jobs growing to hide the fact the establishment has lost control of a supertanker which is ablaze the reset will actually put a growing number of people into this harsh reality. From that we’ll have our hand forced. It will be ugly.

So I ask the question again. If you were offered $400,000 to speak for the sake of protecting your family would you do it? Of course you would but then the most common line I use for people looking for investment  returns is simple – “stop worrying about the return ON your money but the return OF it.”

The Guardian “highlights” its desperation but refuses to learn what FOX already knows

IMG_0396Two weeks ago  I wrote about the desperation of The Guardian to post this statement at the bottom of all its articles. It has now started to further highlight its desperation and do the very thing that ensures it will drive itself out of business. It not only smacks of despair but the audience it appeals (often of the left) to are often those who believe in others paying. The irony of this statement is that it is missing the golden rule of good journalism. If an audience “values” the quality its articles they’ll pay up for “the value” in the content. Keeping journalism as “open as we can” but asking for people for charity to keep it “secure” shows it has the cart before the horse. If The Guardian wrote articles which drew in paying customers encouraging them to open their wallets. It is stuck in the mindset of not willing to reflect that maybe its journalism is the problem.

Exactly one year ago Fairfax, owners of the Sydney Morning Herald (gives 10 free articles a day),  cut back 100-120 journalists/other staff who suffered the same problem. They striked protesting corporate greed when it was the lack of journalistic quality that got them to a position where a company answering to shareholders had to act as a business not a charity for journalists to espouse their prejudices which were clearly having a markedly shrinking effect on readers. It seems in 2017 the SMH hasn’t learnt. On Jan 30th, its home page listed the following articles about Trump. All 20 of its main stories were about him. Not a shred of balance to be seen. Was global and national news so thin that they needed a filler?

IMG_0433.PNG

Look at TV ratings. Yes The Guardian and others must hate Fox News/Newscorp. They can hurl abuse about the political beliefs and views of the audience but look at the scoreboard.

In Monday-Friday primetime, Fox leads the way with 3.83 million viewers, compared to CNN’s 1.83 million and MSNBC’s 1.65 million. For Total Day, Fox is on top with 1.97 million, followed by CNN’s 993,000 and MSNBC’s 736,000. Daytime viewership is also dominated by Fox as it pulled in 2.09 million. Could it be that the pay-per-view crowd, for whatever warped reason, are prepared to pay to watch Fox more than CNN or MSNBC? Could it be when those networks are so desperate for ratings that they overinflate the impact of a boring tax return as the scoop of all-time which in fact backfired in such spectacular fashion that it exposed exactly why they trail in the ratings as they do. Such is the lack of introspection of journalists like Rachel Maddow that even her fellow lefties turned on her for damaging their cause.

The formula is simple – write/produce what the audience WANTS to read/watch and they will beat a path to your door. Tell your audience that you know more than they do with regards to what they want to consume and you will beg cap in hand like you’re doing now. At least we can say The Guardian has put a price on their journalism. It is worth less than a cup of coffee a week apparently. I sincerely hope it was a Venti special Frappicino with a double shot rather than a Small size cup of coffee of the day.

IMG_0435

Perhaps John D. Rockefeller said it best –

“Charity is injurious unless it helps the recipient to become independent of it.”

Poverty in America +16mn since 2000. +9mn since 2008

IMG_0167.PNG

Remember the feel good video Obama proudly displayed alongside his White House economics flunky. Poverty had fallen by the fastest rate since the 1960s. What a crowning achievement. While much praise was heaped upon this shift on searching through the St Louis Fed’s FRED stats database, the picture is disturbing. It is actually little to do with partisan politics but a cry from the disaffected to get anything to change their fortunes.

Let’s take a look at Ohio, a key swing state at the election. While Democrats were patting themselves on the back and staring at the huge drop in the unemployment rate…

img_0164

…poverty was climbing sharply. In fact ever since the tech bubble collapse, the plight of Ohioans has just gotten worse. From 1.1mn in poverty it is now over 1.8mn.

img_0162

On a national level there is little reason to cheer either. Since the tech bubble collapse America has added 16mn to the poverty queue. 7mn under Bush and another 9mn under Obama. This still remains a monstrous challenge for Trump to fix.

IMG_0168.PNG

When looking at poverty on a country level America (15%) fairs better than the UK (23%), EU (26%) and Greece (37%). One table that sends chills down my spine is unemployed persons. This trend has been rock solid for almost 70 years. When unemployed persons hit the following line, the US economy tends to head into recession (the grey shaded areas).

IMG_0153.JPG

With the Fed putting the brakes on low interest rates and the world economy drunk on debt there comes a time for payback. The press can be critical of his appointees and ridicule his executive orders but there is no question as to why he won. He answered the call to the increasingly impoverished people that missed out on the fruits of low interest rates and asset bubbles (incl 20,000 Dow). With more political turmoil awaiting us throughout Europe in the form of elections in France, Holland and Italy we are staring down the barrel of high risk geopolitical stakes.

We better hope he makes America great again with his policies of deregulation and downsizing government. The more the media and shocked liberals protest, loot, pillage and divide the more they trigger exactly what they do not want. For those calling for his impeachment be careful what you wish for. The world will not handle destabilized American politics. The world is well overdue a massive slap in the face. It needs to wake up. We are at a far more important economic juncture than at any time in the past 90 years. Victimology won’t help us. Virtual signaling is pointless. This has nothing to do with race, gender, sexual orientation or religion. These charts show we’ve been drinking our own Kool-Aid for too long. Governments have ignored your wishes and covered up gross negligence along with group think central banks via decades of crony-capitalism.

Trump has much to prove but a larger part of America is well behind the ‘change’ his administration could bring that decades of GOP and Democrat governments have failed to. Yet I ask all those who who litter social media and ask Americans to rise up and do their patriotic duty to resist Trump, “exactly what solutions do you have in mind?” As far as I can see your protesting  is little more than moral preening. You complain yet have nothing to offer in return. We are no longer living in a world where things are free. Eventually someone has to take a haircut. One things is a certainty though. The liberals that cry equality will be the first to cut and run if they become the target of common sense. Let that sink in.