Crime

Canadian mortgage fraud – Laurentian Abyss(m)al

3659F99E-9CCE-4F5F-8317-1AB4A8FB6949.jpeg

Laid up in bed this week with the flu I watched The Hunt for Red October where Sean Connery plays a Russian sub commander with a thick Scottish accent. To rendezvous with the CIA to complete the defection they head to the deep waters of the Laurentian Abyssal, ironically the name of the Canadian bank which has seen the proverbial torpedo hit the propellor.

It seems that Laurentian Bank in Canada has been caught over mortgage fraud, the second lender to do so. Canada’s property prices have trebled since 2000, seeing but a minor blip during GFC. Zerohedge noted,

An audit “identified documentation issues and client misrepresentations” with some mortgages…Laurentian said it will repurchase about C$89 million ($70 million) of those mortgages in the first quarter, or 4.9 percent of such loans sold to the firm….It will buy back an additional C$91 million of mortgages “inadvertently” sold to the firm, also in the first quarter.

The total value of the loans made to the 3rd party was around $1.16bn. Of course the CEO of Laurentian Bank is brushing aside the scale of it.

As we know Home Capital Group, Canada’s largest mortgage lender was busted for mortgage fraud and required a $1.5bn bailout facilitated by the 321,000 Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) members. Not to worry those emergency loans are backed by the mortgages!! Naturally “safe as houses”

Perhaps in the immortal words of Red October Captain Ramius, “be careful what you shoot at in here…things inside here don’t react well to bullets

Or perhaps in the words of Canadian born Inspector Frank Drebbin, “nothing to see here!”

Imperial Palace opened for the autumn leaves

While we should pity the fact that the 84yo Emperor is not allowed to step down before April 2019, His Excellency can still wake up to this natural beauty in the back yard. 10,000s of people there but another 10,000 police doing checks. Having said that while the high police presence is visible the level of checks is still extremely soft. I honestly worry about the 2020 Olympics being a soft target for terrorism as described in this report   平和ボケ

Now Clinton lost the 2016 election because sexual harassers like Matt Lauer were the problem

BFD89AE0-BEFF-4967-A9DC-404A6BF6974B.jpeg

Just when the lame excuses couldn’t get any worse, the NY Times’ Jill Filipovic, in ‘The Men who cost Clinton the Election’ thinks that Clinton lost because of the male journalists (recently fired for claims of sexual harassment) were too tough on her and too easy on Trump. We are 12 months on from the election and despite the 10,000 excuses we’ve heard as to why she lost, this one is truly grasping at straws.

Filipovic wrote,

Many of the male journalists who stand accused of sexual harassment were on the forefront of covering the presidential race between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Matt Lauer interviewed Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump in an official “commander-in-chief forum” for NBC. He notoriously peppered and interrupted Mrs. Clinton with cold, aggressive, condescending questions hyper-focused on her emails, only to pitch softballs at Mr. Trump and treat him with gentle collegiality…Mr. Charlie Rose, after the election, took a tone similar to Mr. Lauer’s with Mrs. Clinton — talking down to her, interrupting her, portraying her as untrustworthy. Mr. Halperin was a harsh critic of Mrs. Clinton, painting her as ruthless and corrupt, while going surprisingly easy on Mr. Trump.”

So Matt Lauer went for the jugular? Isn’t that the point of these debates or commander-in-chief forums – to make the politician squeam under pressure? So her deleting and bleaching 30,000 emails was not a relevant topic?

Mr Halperin painted her as a ruthless and corrupt candidate, when her foundation was exposed for pay to play, the hiring of Debbie Wassermann-Schulz as her campaign director after she brazenly knifed Bernie Sanders during the DNC run-off or receiving the debate questions in advance from Donna Brazile?

Indeed, it is hard to see how Charlie Rose had an impact on the 2016 election when he was tough on her post the event.

Still one can’t escape the fact that for however horrible Trump might have been as a inarticulate, vulgar and bullying GOP candidate, all the more reason she should have smashed it. Had she not taken the election as a coronation, actually visited the areas most in hardship instead of sticking to the $1,000 plate dinner fund raisers in the hubs of NY, LA and San Francisco maybe she would have learnt that it wasn’t a formality. Instead she stuck to identity politics and in the end lost to a candidate who openly stared down the barrel of a camera lens to tens of millions after the ‘grab the p*ssy’ episode and said “no one respects women more than I do” in debate two. Even women saw this and still voted for him.

What Filipovic fails to realize is that gender is an irrelevant benchmark for politics. All that matters is ability in the eyes of the electorate. For Michelle Obama to shame women who voted for Trump is part of the problem. Whether ability is delivered is another question but for millions of struggling Americans not living the dream they took a risk to vote for someone that wasn’t intertwined in the political machine that had failed to get them out of financial squalor. They may not have money but a vote is a great equalizer. Sure, Trump’s complete lack of political experience is telling with the constant cabinet reshuffles and both parties trying to distance themselves from his firebrand style of politics.

So indeed had Lauer been exposed as a sexual harasser before the event then would the outcome of Clinton’s 2016 campaign really have changed? Unlikely as Hillary Clinton was carrying so much baggage that even blind Freddie could have seen through the fact that for as horrible Trump was, she was even worse on so many levels.

Indeed if Filipovic wants to indirectly promote the idea that it was time for a ‘woman’ president, at least give we mere males (and females) some faith that you have a deeper bench than Hillary Clinton. Does a cake store put anything less than its best and delicious looking product in the shop windows on the grand opening day? No. As much as you may wish to point the fingers at a misogynist, sexist bro culture as the blame for her loss, make no mistake that most men (and women) will happily endorse competence over gender because it is in their rational best interests for the long term to do so. So instead of blaming men, perhaps look inside at what women exist in US politics (or any country for that matter) that can carry the torch of freedom on merits alone.

On a final point, while the feminists are at it, where was the outrage at the gushing over the hunky Canadian PM Justin Trudeau when he won his election? How many tweets and messages of teenage crush were seen which focused on his physical characteristics rather than his political acumen (which sadly are missing since being in office). It is a great pity that the Conservative Party in Canada didn’t elect Rona Ambrose over Andrew Scheer as leader. Go on YouTube and watch her decimate Justin Trudeau in every debate. If I was Canadian I would have voted for her given she had raw ability, intelligence and unwavering strength. She just happens to be a woman too.

When it is citizens that require sanctuary

D7002D14-5FFC-433C-8898-B03A1E605F9E.jpeg

For all the loony decisions that are out there, how can jurors in a San Francisco court possibly acquit a person that was deported 5x for multiple felonies and awaiting a 6th deportation before he ended up murdering a citizen, Kate Steinle in 2015? The court ruled it wasn’t murder but an accident because he didn’t intend to fire the gun. So even if the perpetrator, Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, didn’t intend to discharge the weapon in her direction he was none-the-less in possession of a weapon in a manner that had a risk of killing someone intentionally or not. It is irrelevant whether the bullet ricocheted. Steinle is needlessly dead. Not even a manslaughter charge and the taxpayer funded the defence.

For all the arguments supporting sanctuary cities, how little care for actual taxpaying and law abiding citizens can there be if convicted felons get hit with a feather duster while friends and family members end up being traumatized for life as a result? While he may face 3 years jail for possessing a stolen firearm, what society do people want when sentencing is so lenient for people who aren’t even legally allowed to be there?

Which again begs the question of illegal immigrants or refugees seeking asylum. If they are fleeing oppression or any place where their lives might be in danger, what on earth are these people doing trying to be anything other than grateful, courteous and law abiding individuals? Then you have to question the sanity of some Californians thinking these people deserve voting rights! Hmmm.

Even Zarate’s actions are dismissed as being a minute percentage it doesn’t prevent the fact that any country should maintain strict control of its borders and focus on helping those truly in need rather than turn a blind eye to those that exploit the social and economic generosity of others.

While some will no doubt use the Las Vegas shooting as a yardstick, the major difference is that the shooter purchased guns legally and was a citizen. That doesn’t justify what happened rather a shortcoming in gun laws that allowed bump stocks. If enough Americans don’t like it then they’ll force the change. Sloppy Immigration policies where poor screening and even worse border protection is self evident then that in and of itself is no less important a discussion to protect citizens of any country.

Insider trading as a politician is ok?

C4337AB5-C84D-40B9-9D23-07B1C5BD2D87.jpeg

Watching a session of Canadian Parliament yesterday, the opposition Conservative party asked for a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer to a question to Trudeau’s Finance Minister Bill Morneau on whether he sold $10m in shares in Morneau-Shepell a week before a new capital gains tax on securities was introduced in parliament. The accusation was that Morneau made $500,000 by insider trading in full knowledge of the tax change that was to be introduced. Morneau spent the entire 20 minutes talking of how his party is defending the middle class with tax cuts. If he was not the person that sold, how easy to openly admit so. So far he’s said nothing.

Insider trading is a punishable offense in the private sector. Yet are politicIans free to make half a million by trading ahead of the event? How can Morneau not resign? Even worse was  Speaker of the House Greg Regan was asking why the question from Paul Pollievre was relevant in question time? Are you kidding me?

Clearly ethics training for Trudeau’s cabinet seems far more pertinent than reintegration of returning ISIS tourists. Then again we shouldn’t forget that Trudeau was actually involved in the appointment of the Ethics Commissioner (without consulting the opposition) indeed at a time when his own ethics had been openly called into question.

Kiwis are clessic at making ettention grebbing videos eh Bro!

The Kiwis are not only great at rugby, they also seem to have a kneck (knack) of making entertainment information videos. While the police recruitment video is chock full of diversity it is none the less a well thought and attention grabbing. Here are two other classics – the Air New Zealand inflight safety video and the AIG ‘tackling the risk’ video both starring the All Blacks.

When feminism goes too far

6C21B296-4A32-43F6-BFD4-F19CAF51817A.jpeg

Any “person” who is rightfully comvicted of sexual assault should have the book thrown at them with full force. No arguments. However when Teen Vogue journalist and feminist Emily Lindin wrote that there is no problem throwing innocent men out of jobs and destroying their lives through false allegations that takes some beating. Indeed CM warned that the #METOO campaign might indeed turn into a witch hunt ruining the futures of innocent men forced to defend themselves.

Lindin justified her stance by saying “First, false allegations VERY rarely happen, so even bringing it up borders on a derailment tactic. It’s a microscopic risk in comparison to the issue at hand (worldwide, systemic oppression of half the population),

The benefit of all of us getting to finally tell the truth + the impact on victims FAR outweigh the loss of any one man’s reputation…If some innocent men’s reputations have to take a hit in the process of undoing the patriarchy, that is a price I am absolutely willing to pay.

Indeed “what” price are you actually paying Emily when it is those innocent men who will actually pay it on your behalf? That’s right she is paying zero. In the process perhaps the innocent man ( and sole breadwinner) who is jailed for sexual assault loses the family house, wife and 3 daughters. That’s right Ms Lindin, you’ve scored 4 own goals in the process.

Perhaps Lindin could have written that she will visit these innocent men and thank them personally for doing jail time all the while she celebrates her feminist buddies committing perjury.

Any person that willingly makes a false allegation should equally have the book thrown at them. Indeed perhaps she should read up on sexual violence committed against men (hugely underreported) but that would run against her loony narrative.

We should be glad she has said this though. Free speech is wonderful in that she expresses such a stupid position that the exposure to sunlight becomes the best disinfectant. Way to go Emily. May more people like you expose how stupid victimhood becomes when you go actively searching for it. To that end there can be no doubt you’ve never been a true victim of sexual assault to say something so preposterous. No real victim of such a crime would ever back what you wrote. After all why would any innocent person who had that stolen from them want anyone else to experience what they did?