A guide to gender-sensitive bombing

Apparently, the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) is being asked to consider “the role of gender” while bombing under ‘Gender in Air Operations‘ guidelines. It stems from the risk that should a sortie damage a bridge it might cause the local women to have to walk further to perform daily necessities such as gathering firewood or water supplies. Perhaps they should drop leaflets instead of bombs that tell the males on the ground to ditch their toxic masculinity and do their bit for equality!

Isn’t the point of having air superiority one that gives the home side a tactical advantage in warfare against an enemy sworn to kill? Are we funding our military to win wars or assist the enemy to gain tactical advantages against our own ground troops? What next? Shall we supply the enemy with surface-to-air missiles to even out the fight for the sake of battlefield equality?

Our military has lost the plot. Only last week, a ban was put out to stop the use of death symbols. Camouflage Helly Kitty here we come. Seriously though, if such patches make soldiers feel 10 foot tall then surely the morale-boosting benefits outweigh getting in step with the times. As General Patton once said, “The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.”

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s